» Articles » PMID: 23320937

Child-adult Differences in the Kinetics of Torque Development

Overview
Journal J Sports Sci
Publisher Routledge
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2013 Jan 17
PMID 23320937
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Children have lower size-normalised maximal voluntary force, speed, and power than adults. It has been hypothesised that these and other age-related performance differences are due to lesser type-II motor-unit utilisation in children. This should be manifested as slower force kinetics in explosive muscle contractions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the nature of child-adult force-kinetics differences and whether the latter could support that hypothesis. Untrained boys (n = 20) and men (n = 20) (10.1 ± 1.3 and 22.9 ± 4.4 years, respectively), performed maximal, explosive, isometric elbow flexions and knee extensions on a Biodex dynamometer. Peak torque (MVC), times to 10-100% MVC, and other kinetics parameters were determined. The boys' body-mass-normalised knee extension MVC, peak rate of torque development, and %MVC at 100 ms were 26, 17 and 23% lower compared with the men and their times to 30% and 80% MVC were 24 and 48% longer, respectively. Elbow flexion kinetics showed similar or greater differences. The findings illuminate boys' inherent disadvantage in tasks requiring speed or explosive force. It is demonstrated that the extent of the boys-men kinetics disparity cannot be explained by muscle-composition and/or musculo-tendinous-stiffness differences. We suggest therefore that the findings indirectly support children's lower utilisation of type-II motor units.

Citing Articles

Joint position and force senses in young female tennis players and untrained adolescents.

Niespodzinski B, Waldzinski T, Durzynska A, Mieszkowski J, Knas M, Kochanowicz A PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0312483.

PMID: 39436925 PMC: 11495642. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312483.


How mechanics of individual muscle-tendon units define knee and ankle joint function in health and cerebral palsy-a narrative review.

Keles C, Ates F Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1287385.

PMID: 38116195 PMC: 10728775. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1287385.


Skeletal Muscle Measurements in Pediatric Hematology and Oncology: Essential Components to a Comprehensive Assessment.

Rock K, Addison O, Gray V, Henshaw R, Ward C, Marchese V Children (Basel). 2023; 10(1).

PMID: 36670664 PMC: 9856749. DOI: 10.3390/children10010114.


Elbow Joint Position and Force Senses in Young and Adult Untrained People and Gymnasts.

Niespodzinski B, Mieszkowski J, Sawczyn S, Kochanowicz K, Szulc A, Zasada M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(13).

PMID: 35805246 PMC: 9265726. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19137592.


Strength Abilities and Serve Reception Efficiency of Youth Female Volleyball Players.

Pawlik D, Dziubek W, Rogowski L, Struzik A, Rokita A Appl Bionics Biomech. 2022; 2022:4328761.

PMID: 35694275 PMC: 9177318. DOI: 10.1155/2022/4328761.


References
1.
Andersen L, Aagaard P . Influence of maximal muscle strength and intrinsic muscle contractile properties on contractile rate of force development. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005; 96(1):46-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-005-0070-z. View

2.
Lambertz D, Mora I, Grosset J, Perot C . Evaluation of musculotendinous stiffness in prepubertal children and adults, taking into account muscle activity. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003; 95(1):64-72. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00885.2002. View

3.
Calder K, Gabriel D . Adaptations during familiarization to resistive exercise. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2006; 17(3):328-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.02.006. View

4.
Aagaard P, Simonsen E, Andersen J, Magnusson P, Dyhre-Poulsen P . Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002; 93(4):1318-26. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00283.2002. View

5.
Falk B, Usselman C, Dotan R, Brunton L, Klentrou P, Shaw J . Child-adult differences in muscle strength and activation pattern during isometric elbow flexion and extension. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2009; 34(4):609-15. PMC: 3797084. DOI: 10.1139/H09-020. View