» Articles » PMID: 31711494

Comparative Evaluation of Two Commercial ELISA Kits for Detection of Antibodies Against Akabane Virus in Cattle Serum

Overview
Journal BMC Vet Res
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2019 Nov 13
PMID 31711494
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Akabane disease (AD), a barrier to international trade for endemic areas with far economic impact on the countries, is caused by Akabane virus (AKAV). Commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a commonly used diagnostic technique for AKAV infection, including the IDEXX and IDVET ELISA kits. However, the comparative evaluation of the IDEXX and IDVET ELISA kits has not been published. The object of this study was to evaluate the test performance of the two commercial ELISA kits in detecting serum anti-AKAV antibodies in cattle.

Results: With virus neutralization test (VNT) as the "relative gold standard", the diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) was 80.39% (123/153) and 93.46% (143/153) for the IDEXX and IDVET ELISA kit, when suspect samples were included. The diagnostic specificity (DSp) for the IDEXX and IDVET ELISA kit was 93.48% (502/537) and 82.31% (442/537), respectively.

Conclusion: Both of the tested ELISA kits could be applied to detect antibodies against AKAV in cattle serum. The IDVET ELISA kit had a higher DSe. The IDEXX ELISA kit possessed the higher DSp. These results have important implications if the kits are used to screen herds or individual cattle in surveillance programs, or at border crossings for import-export inspection and quarantine.

Citing Articles

Revisiting the Importance of Orthobunyaviruses for Animal Health: A Scoping Review of Livestock Disease, Diagnostic Tests, and Surveillance Strategies for the Simbu Serogroup.

OConnor T, Hick P, Finlaison D, Kirkland P, Toribio J Viruses. 2024; 16(2).

PMID: 38400069 PMC: 10892073. DOI: 10.3390/v16020294.


The First Serological Detection and Risk Factors Analysis of Akabane Virus in Egyptian Cattle.

Metwally S, Bkear N, Samir M, Hamada R, Elshafey B, Batiha G Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(11).

PMID: 37889776 PMC: 10252070. DOI: 10.3390/ani13111849.


Current methods and prospects of coronavirus detection.

Bu J, Deng Z, Liu H, Li J, Wang D, Yang Y Talanta. 2021; 225:121977.

PMID: 33592725 PMC: 7833523. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121977.


Endemic and Emerging Arboviruses in Domestic Ruminants in East Asia.

Yanase T, Murota K, Hayama Y Front Vet Sci. 2020; 7:168.

PMID: 32318588 PMC: 7154088. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00168.

References
1.
Ide S, Baba K, Tsuchimoto M, Nagano H, Eiguchi Y, Yamagami T . Detection of antibodies against Akabane virus in bovine sera by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Vet Microbiol. 1989; 20(3):275-80. DOI: 10.1016/0378-1135(89)90051-5. View

2.
Wernike K, Brocchi E, Cordioli P, Senechal Y, Schelp C, Wegelt A . A novel panel of monoclonal antibodies against Schmallenberg virus nucleoprotein and glycoprotein Gc allows specific orthobunyavirus detection and reveals antigenic differences. Vet Res. 2015; 46:27. PMC: 4354985. DOI: 10.1186/s13567-015-0165-4. View

3.
Yadav P, Chaubal G, Shete A, Mourya D . A mini-review of Bunyaviruses recorded in India. Indian J Med Res. 2017; 145(5):601-610. PMC: 5644294. DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1871_15. View

4.
Wang J, Blasdell K, Yin H, Walker P . A large-scale serological survey of Akabane virus infection in cattle, yak, sheep and goats in China. Vet Microbiol. 2017; 207:7-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.05.014. View

5.
Elliott R . Orthobunyaviruses: recent genetic and structural insights. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014; 12(10):673-85. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro3332. View