» Articles » PMID: 31668700

Virtual Preoperative Planning and 3D Printing Are Valuable for the Management of Complex Orthopaedic Trauma

Overview
Date 2019 Nov 1
PMID 31668700
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The technology of 3D printing (3DP) exists for quite some time, but it is still not utilized to its full potential in the field of orthopaedics and traumatology, such as underestimating its worth in virtual preoperative planning (VPP) and designing various models, templates, and jigs. It can be a significant tool in the reduction of surgical morbidity and better surgical outcome avoiding various associated complications.

Methods: An observational study was done including 91 cases of complex trauma presented in our institution requiring operative fixation. Virtual preoperative planning and 3DP were used in the management of these fractures. Surgeons managing these cases were given a set of questionnaire and responses were recorded and assessed as a quantitative data.

Results: In all the 91 cases, where VPP and 3DP were used, the surgeons were satisfied with the outcome which they got intraoperatively and postoperatively. Surgical time was reduced, with a better outcome. Three dimensional models of complex fracture were helpful in understanding the anatomy and sketching out the plans for optimum reduction and fixation. The average score of the questionnaire was 4.5, out of a maximum of 6, suggesting a positive role of 3DP in orthopaedics.

Conclusion: 3DP is useful in complex trauma management by accurate reduction and placement of implants, reduction of surgical time and with a better outcome. Although there is an initial learning curve to understand and execute the VPP and 3DP, these become easier with practice and experience.

Citing Articles

Clinical applications of 3D printing in spine surgery: a systematic review.

Hajnal B, Pokorni A, Turbucz M, Bereczki F, Bartos M, Lazary A Eur Spine J. 2025; 34(2):454-471.

PMID: 39774918 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08594-y.


Symmetry of the left and right tibial plafond; a comparison of 75 distal tibia pairs.

Verbakel J, Boot M, van der Gaast N, Dunning H, Bakker M, Jaarsma R Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024; 50(6):2877-2882.

PMID: 38874625 PMC: 11666608. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02568-x.


Artificial intelligence-based orthopaedic perpetual design.

Akhtar M, Haleem A, Javaid M, Mathur S, Vaish A, Vaishya R J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024; 49:102356.

PMID: 38361509 PMC: 10865397. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102356.


Advanced Preoperative Planning Techniques in the Management of Complex Proximal Humerus Fractures.

Yasen Z, Robinson A, Woffenden H Cureus. 2024; 16(1):e51551.

PMID: 38313919 PMC: 10835086. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.51551.


Automatic segmentation of inconstant fractured fragments for tibia/fibula from CT images using deep learning.

Kim H, Jeon Y, Park K, Cha H, Kim M, You J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):20431.

PMID: 37993627 PMC: 10665312. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47706-4.


References
1.
Lal H, Patralekh M . 3D printing and its applications in orthopaedic trauma: A technological marvel. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018; 9(3):260-268. PMC: 6128305. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.07.022. View

2.
Maini L, Vaishya R, Lal H . Will 3D printing take away surgical planning from doctors?. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018; 9(3):193. PMC: 6128806. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.06.013. View

3.
Lu S, Xu Y, Lu W, Ni G, Li Y, Shi J . A novel patient-specific navigational template for cervical pedicle screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(26):E959-66. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c09985. View

4.
Dai K, Yan M, Zhu Z, Sun Y . Computer-aided custom-made hemipelvic prosthesis used in extensive pelvic lesions. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(7):981-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.002. View

5.
Vaish A, Vaish R . 3D printing and its applications in Orthopedics. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018; 9(Suppl 1):S74-S75. PMC: 5883906. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.02.003. View