» Articles » PMID: 37252303

Application of 3D Printing Technology in the Treatment of Hoffa's Fracture Nonunion

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2023 May 30
PMID 37252303
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

 To evaluate a proposed three-dimensional (3D) printing process of a biomodel developed with the aid of fused deposition modeling (FDM) technology based on computed tomography (CT) scans of an individual with nonunion of a coronal femoral condyle fracture (Hoffa's fracture).  Thus, we used CT scans, which enable the evaluation of the 3D volumetric reconstruction of the anatomical model, as well as of the architecture and bone geometry of sites with complex anatomy, such as the joints. In addition, it enables the development of the virtual surgical planning (VSP) in a computer-aided design (CAD) software. This technology makes it possible to print full-scale anatomical models that can be used in surgical simulations for training and in the choice of the best placement of the implant according to the VSP. In the radiographic evaluation of the osteosynthesis of the Hoffa's fracture nonunion, we assessed the position of the implant in the 3D-printed anatomical model and in the patient's knee.  The 3D-printed anatomical model showed geometric and morphological characteristics similar to those of the actual bone. The position of the implants in relation to the nonunion line and anatomical landmarks showed great accuracy in the comparison of the patient's knee with the 3D-printed anatomical model.  The use of the virtual anatomical model and the 3D-printed anatomical model with the additive manufacturing (AM) technology proved to be effective and useful in planning and performing the surgical treatment of Hoffa's fracture nonunion. Thus, it showed great accuracy in the reproducibility of the virtual surgical planning and the 3D-printed anatomical model.

Citing Articles

Optimizing management strategies for malunion and nonunion of Hoffa fractures: a detailed case series with a proposed treatment algorithm.

Pires R, Carabelli G, Barla J, Bidolegui F, Pires E Albuquerque R, Giordano V Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024; 35(1):36.

PMID: 39666086 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-04163-7.

References
1.
Zheng W, Chen C, Zhang C, Tao Z, Cai L . The Feasibility of 3D Printing Technology on the Treatment of Pilon Fracture and Its Effect on Doctor-Patient Communication. Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018:8054698. PMC: 5822891. DOI: 10.1155/2018/8054698. View

2.
Hoang D, Perrault D, Stevanovic M, Ghiassi A . Surgical applications of three-dimensional printing: a review of the current literature & how to get started. Ann Transl Med. 2017; 4(23):456. PMC: 5220021. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2016.12.18. View

3.
Rankin T, Wormer B, Miller J, Giovinco N, Al Kassis S, Armstrong D . Image once, print thrice? Three-dimensional printing of replacement parts. Br J Radiol. 2017; 91(1083):20170374. PMC: 5965480. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170374. View

4.
Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, Annemans L . 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. Biomed Eng Online. 2016; 15(1):115. PMC: 5073919. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-016-0236-4. View

5.
Bizzotto N, Tami I, Tami A, Spiegel A, Romani D, Corain M . 3D Printed models of distal radius fractures. Injury. 2016; 47(4):976-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.01.013. View