» Articles » PMID: 31661571

High-energy Visible Light at Ambient Doses and Intensities Induces Oxidative Stress of Skin-Protective Effects of the Antioxidant and Nrf2 Inducer Licochalcone A in Vitro and in Vivo

Overview
Date 2019 Oct 30
PMID 31661571
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Solar radiation causes skin damage through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). While UV filters effectively reduce UV-induced ROS, they cannot prevent VIS-induced (400-760 nm) oxidative stress. Therefore, potent antioxidants are needed as additives to sunscreen products.

Methods: We investigated VIS-induced ROS formation and the photoprotective effects of the Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone A (LicA).

Results: Visible spectrum of 400-500 nm dose-dependently induced ROS in cultured human fibroblasts at doses equivalent to 1 hour of sunshine on a sunny summer day (150 J/cm ). A pretreatment for 24 hours with 1 µmol/L LicA reduced ROS formation to the level of unirradiated cells while UV filters alone were ineffective, even at SPF50+. In vivo, topical treatment with a LicA-containing SPF50 + formulation significantly prevented the depletion of intradermal carotenoids by VIS irradiation while SPF50 + control did not protect.

Conclusion: LicA may be a useful additive antioxidant for sunscreens.

Citing Articles

Photoaging: Current Concepts on Molecular Mechanisms, Prevention, and Treatment.

Kaltchenko M, Chien A Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025; .

PMID: 40072791 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-025-00933-z.


The Emerging Role of Visible Light in Melanocyte Biology and Skin Pigmentary Disorders: Friend or Foe?.

He X, Jin S, Dai X, Chen L, Xiang L, Zhang C J Clin Med. 2023; 12(23).

PMID: 38068540 PMC: 10707362. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12237488.


Induction of Skin Cancer by Long-Term Blue Light Irradiation.

Hiramoto K, Kubo S, Tsuji K, Sugiyama D, Hamano H Biomedicines. 2023; 11(8).

PMID: 37626816 PMC: 10452187. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11082321.


Impact of blue light on skin pigmentation in patients with melasma.

Li L, Jiang X, Tu Y, Yang Y, Zhang X, Gu H Skin Res Technol. 2023; 29(7):e13401.

PMID: 37522494 PMC: 10315449. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13401.


Effects and Mechanism of the Callus Culture Extract on Blue Light Damage in Human Foreskin Fibroblasts.

Meng X, Guo M, Geng Z, Wang Z, Zhang H, Li S Molecules. 2023; 28(5).

PMID: 36903418 PMC: 10004670. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28052172.


References
1.
Greaves A . The effects of narrowbands of visible light upon some skin disorders: a review. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2015; 38(4):325-45. DOI: 10.1111/ics.12305. View

2.
Duteil L, Esdaile J, Maubert Y, Cathelineau A, Bouloc A, Queille-Roussel C . A method to assess the protective efficacy of sunscreens against visible light-induced pigmentation. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2017; 33(5):260-266. DOI: 10.1111/phpp.12325. View

3.
Robert C, Bonnet M, Marques S, Numa M, Doucet O . Low to moderate doses of infrared A irradiation impair extracellular matrix homeostasis of the skin and contribute to skin photodamage. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2015; 28(4):196-204. DOI: 10.1159/000369829. View

4.
Balic A, Mokos M . Do We Utilize Our Knowledge of the Skin Protective Effects of Carotenoids Enough?. Antioxidants (Basel). 2019; 8(8). PMC: 6719967. DOI: 10.3390/antiox8080259. View

5.
Lohan S, Muller R, Albrecht S, Mink K, Tscherch K, Ismaeel F . Free radicals induced by sunlight in different spectral regions - in vivo versus ex vivo study. Exp Dermatol. 2016; 25(5):380-5. DOI: 10.1111/exd.12987. View