» Articles » PMID: 31652018

Passive Perceptual Learning Modulates Motor Inhibitory Control in Superior Frontal Regions

Overview
Journal Hum Brain Mapp
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Neurology
Date 2019 Oct 26
PMID 31652018
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Response inhibition is of vital importance in the context of controlling inappropriate responses. The role of perceptual processes during inhibitory control has attracted increased interest. Yet, we are far from an understanding of the mechanisms. One candidate mechanism by which perceptual processes may affect response inhibition refers to "gain control" that is closely linked to the signal-to-noise ratio of incoming information. A means to modulate the signal-to-noise ratio and gain control mechanisms is perceptual learning. In the current study, we examine the impact of perceptual learning (i.e., passive repetitive sensory stimulation) on response inhibition combining EEG signal decomposition with source localization analyses. A tactile GO/NOGO paradigm was conducted to measure action restraint as one subcomponent of response inhibition. We show that passive perceptual learning modulates response inhibition processes. In particular, perceptual learning attenuates the detrimental effect of response automation during inhibitory control. Temporally decomposed EEG data show that stimulus-related and not response selection processes during conflict monitoring are linked to these effects. The superior and middle frontal gyrus (BA6), as well as the motor cortex (BA4), are associated with the effects of perceptual learning on response inhibition. Reliable neurophysiological effects were not evident on the basis of standard ERPs, which has important methodological implications for perceptual learning research. The results detail how lower level sensory plasticity protocols affect higher-order cognitive control functions in frontal cortical structures.

Citing Articles

Neurobiological influences on event perception: the role of catecholamines.

Ghorbani F, Zhou X, Roessner V, Hommel B, Prochnow A, Beste C Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2025; 28(2).

PMID: 39981699 PMC: 11879076. DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaf008.


Neurophysiological correlates of perception-action binding in the somatosensory system.

Friedrich J, Verrel J, Kleimaker M, Munchau A, Beste C, Baumer T Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):14794.

PMID: 32908197 PMC: 7481208. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71779-0.


Passive perceptual learning modulates motor inhibitory control in superior frontal regions.

Friedrich J, Beste C Hum Brain Mapp. 2019; 41(3):726-738.

PMID: 31652018 PMC: 7267975. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24835.

References
1.
Francis S, KELLY E, Bowtell R, DUNSEATH W, Folger S, McGlone F . fMRI of the responses to vibratory stimulation of digit tips. Neuroimage. 2000; 11(3):188-202. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0541. View

2.
Stevenson H, Russell P, Helton W . Search asymmetry, sustained attention, and response inhibition. Brain Cogn. 2011; 77(2):215-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.08.007. View

3.
Chmielewski W, Muckschel M, Beste C . Response selection codes in neurophysiological data predict conjoint effects of controlled and automatic processes during response inhibition. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018; 39(4):1839-1849. PMC: 6866562. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23974. View

4.
Larson M, Clayson P, Clawson A . Making sense of all the conflict: a theoretical review and critique of conflict-related ERPs. Int J Psychophysiol. 2014; 93(3):283-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.06.007. View

5.
Sanchez Panchuelo R, Besle J, Schluppeck D, Humberstone M, Francis S . Somatotopy in the Human Somatosensory System. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018; 12:235. PMC: 6008546. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00235. View