» Articles » PMID: 28687804

On the Effects of Multimodal Information Integration in Multitasking

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Jul 9
PMID 28687804
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There have recently been considerable advances in our understanding of the neuronal mechanisms underlying multitasking, but the role of multimodal integration for this faculty has remained rather unclear. We examined this issue by comparing different modality combinations in a multitasking (stop-change) paradigm. In-depth neurophysiological analyses of event-related potentials (ERPs) were conducted to complement the obtained behavioral data. Specifically, we applied signal decomposition using second order blind identification (SOBI) to the multi-subject ERP data and source localization. We found that both general multimodal information integration and modality-specific aspects (potentially related to task difficulty) modulate behavioral performance and associated neurophysiological correlates. Simultaneous multimodal input generally increased early attentional processing of visual stimuli (i.e. P1 and N1 amplitudes) as well as measures of cognitive effort and conflict (i.e. central P3 amplitudes). Yet, tactile-visual input caused larger impairments in multitasking than audio-visual input. General aspects of multimodal information integration modulated the activity in the premotor cortex (BA 6) as well as different visual association areas concerned with the integration of visual information with input from other modalities (BA 19, BA 21, BA 37). On top of this, differences in the specific combination of modalities also affected performance and measures of conflict/effort originating in prefrontal regions (BA 6).

Citing Articles

Advancements in Smart Wearable Mobility Aids for Visual Impairments: A Bibliometric Narrative Review.

Zhang X, Huang X, Ding Y, Long L, Li W, Xu X Sensors (Basel). 2025; 24(24.

PMID: 39771730 PMC: 11679352. DOI: 10.3390/s24247986.


Individual Differences in the Impact of Distracting Environmental Sounds on the Performance of a Continuous Visual Task in Older Adults.

Richards L, Carter N, Hanley C, Barnes C, Summers H, Porter A Brain Sci. 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39595810 PMC: 11591658. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14111048.


A touching advantage: cross-modal stop-signals improve reactive response inhibition.

Friehs M, Schmalbrock P, Merz S, Dechant M, Hartwigsen G, Frings C Exp Brain Res. 2024; 242(3):599-618.

PMID: 38227008 PMC: 10894768. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06767-7.


The role of visual association cortices during response selection processes in interference-modulated response stopping.

Eggert E, Ghin F, Stock A, Muckschel M, Beste C Cereb Cortex Commun. 2023; 4(1):tgac050.

PMID: 36654911 PMC: 9837466. DOI: 10.1093/texcom/tgac050.


A cerebellum inspired spiking neural network as a multi-model for pattern classification and robotic trajectory prediction.

Vijayan A, Diwakar S Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:909146.

PMID: 36518530 PMC: 9742384. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.909146.


References
1.
Luck , Woodman , Vogel . Event-related potential studies of attention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000; 4(11):432-440. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01545-x. View

2.
Meredith M . On the neuronal basis for multisensory convergence: a brief overview. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002; 14(1):31-40. DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00059-9. View

3.
Ffytche D . Neural codes for conscious vision. Trends Cogn Sci. 2002; 6(12):493-495. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)02029-6. View

4.
Botvinick M, Cohen J, Carter C . Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004; 8(12):539-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.003. View

5.
Hazeltine E, Ruthruff E . Modality pairing effects and the response selection bottleneck. Psychol Res. 2005; 70(6):504-13. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0017-3. View