» Articles » PMID: 31645052

Premature Birth Impacts Bolus Size and Shape Through Nursing in Infant Pigs

Overview
Journal Pediatr Res
Specialties Biology
Pediatrics
Date 2019 Oct 24
PMID 31645052
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The formation of a bolus of food is critical for proper feeding function, and there is substantial variation in the size and shape of a bolus prior to a swallow. Preterm infants exhibit decreased abilities to acquire and process food, but how that relates to their bolus size and shape is unknown. Here, we test two hypotheses: (1) that bolus size and shape will differ between term and preterm infants, and (2) bolus size and shape will change longitudinally through development in both term and preterm infants.

Methods: To test these hypotheses, we measured bolus size and shape in preterm and term infant pigs longitudinally through nursing using high-speed videofluoroscopy.

Results: Preterm infant pigs swallowed smaller volumes of milk. Although term infants increased the amount of milk per swallow as they aged, preterm infants did not. These changes in bolus volume were also correlated with changes in bolus shape; larger boluses became more elongate as they better filled the available anatomical space of the valleculae.

Conclusions: These results suggest that preterm birth reduces the ability of preterm pigs to increase bolus size as they grow, affecting development in this fragile population. These results highlight that studies on term infant feeding may not translate to preterm infants.

Citing Articles

A Ducted, Biomimetic Nipple Improves Aspects of Infant Feeding Physiology and Performance in an Animal Model.

Mayerl C, Kaczmarek E, Smith A, Shideler H, Blilie M, Edmonds C Dysphagia. 2024; .

PMID: 39487856 DOI: 10.1007/s00455-024-10780-5.


The effects of simulated gastroesophageal reflux on infant pig oropharyngeal feeding physiology.

Edmonds C, Robbins K, Dvorak E, Howe S, Sheldon S, Mayerl C Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2024; 327(1):G105-G116.

PMID: 38772905 PMC: 11376974. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00027.2024.


The Impact of Varying Nipple Properties on Infant Feeding Physiology and Performance Throughout Ontogeny in a Validated Animal Model.

Steer K, Johnson M, Edmonds C, Adjerid K, Bond L, German R Dysphagia. 2023; 39(3):460-467.

PMID: 37947879 PMC: 11181904. DOI: 10.1007/s00455-023-10630-w.


Evolution, diversification and function of the maternal-infant dyad in mammalian feeding.

Mayerl C, German R Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 378(1891):20220554.

PMID: 37839443 PMC: 10577036. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0554.


Impact of volume and rate of milk delivery on coordination of respiration and swallowing in infant pigs.

Gould F, Mayerl C, Adjerid K, Edmonds C, Charles N, Johnson M J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol. 2023; 339(10):1052-1058.

PMID: 37653670 PMC: 11321598. DOI: 10.1002/jez.2754.


References
1.
Iwata H, Ukai Y . SHAPE: a computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. J Hered. 2003; 93(5):384-5. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/93.5.384. View

2.
Gierbolini-Norat E, Holman S, Ding P, Bakshi S, German R . Variation in the timing and frequency of sucking and swallowing over an entire feeding session in the infant pig Sus scrofa. Dysphagia. 2014; 29(4):475-82. PMC: 4256004. DOI: 10.1007/s00455-014-9532-y. View

3.
Rommel N, van Wijk M, Boets B, Hebbard G, Haslam R, Davidson G . Development of pharyngo-esophageal physiology during swallowing in the preterm infant. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011; 23(10):e401-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01763.x. View

4.
Prabhakar V, Hasenstab K, Osborn E, Wei L, Jadcherla S . Pharyngeal contractile and regulatory characteristics are distinct during nutritive oral stimulus in preterm-born infants: Implications for clinical and research applications. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019; 31(8):e13650. PMC: 6793932. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13650. View

5.
Lau C, Sheena H, Shulman R, Schanler R . Oral feeding in low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 1997; 130(4):561-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)70240-3. View