» Articles » PMID: 33103058

Preterm Birth Impacts the Timing and Excursion of Oropharyngeal Structures During Infant Feeding

Overview
Journal Integr Org Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Oct 26
PMID 33103058
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Swallowing in mammals requires the precise coordination of multiple oropharyngeal structures, including the palatopharyngeal arch. During a typical swallow, the activity of the palatopharyngeus muscle produces pharyngeal shortening to assist in producing pressure required to swallow and may initiate epiglottal flipping to protect the airway. Most research on the role of the palatopharyngeal arch in swallowing has used pharyngeal manometry, which measures the relative pressures in the oropharynx, but does not quantify the movements of the structures involved in swallowing. In this study, we assessed palatopharyngeal arch and soft palate function by comparing their movements in a healthy population to a pathophysiological population longitudinally through infancy (term versus preterm pigs). In doing so, we test the impact of birth status, postnatal maturation, and their interaction on swallowing. We tracked the three-dimensional (3D) movements of radiopaque beads implanted into relevant anatomical structures and recorded feeding via biplanar high-speed videofluoroscopy. We then calculated the total 3D excursion of the arch and soft palate, the orientation of arch movement, and the timing of maximal arch constriction during each swallow. Soft palate excursion was greater in term infants at both 7 and 17 days postnatal, whereas arch excursion was largely unaffected by birth status. Maximal arch constriction occurred much earlier in preterm pigs relative to term pigs, a result that was consistent across age. There was no effect of postnatal age on arch or soft palate excursion. Preterm and term infants differed in their orientation of arch movement, which most likely reflects both differences in anatomy and differences in feeding posture. Our results suggest that the timing and coordination of oropharyngeal movements may be more important to feeding performance than the movements of isolated structures, and that differences in the neural control of swallowing and its maturation in preterm and term infants may explain preterm swallowing deficits.

Citing Articles

The effects of simulated gastroesophageal reflux on infant pig oropharyngeal feeding physiology.

Edmonds C, Robbins K, Dvorak E, Howe S, Sheldon S, Mayerl C Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2024; 327(1):G105-G116.

PMID: 38772905 PMC: 11376974. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00027.2024.


The Impact of Varying Nipple Properties on Infant Feeding Physiology and Performance Throughout Ontogeny in a Validated Animal Model.

Steer K, Johnson M, Edmonds C, Adjerid K, Bond L, German R Dysphagia. 2023; 39(3):460-467.

PMID: 37947879 PMC: 11181904. DOI: 10.1007/s00455-023-10630-w.


Head posture impacts mammalian hyoid position and suprahyoid muscle length: implication for swallowing biomechanics.

Li P, Ross C, Luo Z, Gidmark N Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 378(1891):20220552.

PMID: 37839446 PMC: 10577029. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0552.


Biomechanical and Cortical Control of Tongue Movements During Chewing and Swallowing.

Ross C, Laurence-Chasen J, Li P, Orsbon C, Hatsopoulos N Dysphagia. 2023; 39(1):1-32.

PMID: 37326668 PMC: 10781858. DOI: 10.1007/s00455-023-10596-9.


Effect of cue-based feeding on time to nipple feed and time to discharge in very low birth weight infants.

Spagnoli J, Dhanireddy R, Gannon E, Chilakala S Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):9509.

PMID: 37308556 PMC: 10261117. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36634-y.


References
1.
Castell D . Manometric evaluation of the pharynx. Dysphagia. 1993; 8(4):337-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF01321774. View

2.
Gierbolini-Norat E, Holman S, Ding P, Bakshi S, German R . Variation in the timing and frequency of sucking and swallowing over an entire feeding session in the infant pig Sus scrofa. Dysphagia. 2014; 29(4):475-82. PMC: 4256004. DOI: 10.1007/s00455-014-9532-y. View

3.
Thexton A, Crompton A, German R . EMG activity in hyoid muscles during pig suckling. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012; 112(9):1512-9. PMC: 4073940. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00450.2011. View

4.
Prabhakar V, Hasenstab K, Osborn E, Wei L, Jadcherla S . Pharyngeal contractile and regulatory characteristics are distinct during nutritive oral stimulus in preterm-born infants: Implications for clinical and research applications. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019; 31(8):e13650. PMC: 6793932. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13650. View

5.
Thexton A, Crompton A, Owerkowicz T, German R . Correlation between intraoral pressures and tongue movements in the suckling pig. Arch Oral Biol. 2004; 49(7):567-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2004.02.002. View