» Articles » PMID: 18052999

Maturation of Oral Feeding Skills in Preterm Infants

Overview
Journal Acta Paediatr
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2007 Dec 7
PMID 18052999
Citations 76
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: Safe and successful oral feeding requires proper maturation of sucking, swallowing and respiration. We hypothesized that oral feeding difficulties result from different temporal development of the musculatures implicated in these functions.

Methods: Sixteen medically stable preterm infants (26 to 29 weeks gestation, GA) were recruited. Specific feeding skills were monitored as indirect markers for the maturational process of oral feeding musculatures: rate of milk intake (mL/min); percent milk leakage (lip seal); sucking stage, rate (#/s) and suction/expression ratio; suction amplitude (mmHg), rate and slope (mmHg/s); sucking/swallowing ratio; percent occurrence of swallows at specific phases of respiration. Coefficients of variation (COV) were used as indices of functional stability. Infants, born at 26/27- and 28/29-week GA, were at similar postmenstrual ages (PMA) when taking 1-2 and 6-8 oral feedings per day.

Results: Over time, feeding efficiency and several skills improved, some decreased and others remained unchanged. Differences in COVs between the two GA groups demonstrated that, despite similar oral feeding outcomes, maturation levels of certain skills differed.

Conclusions: Components of sucking, swallowing, respiration and their coordinated activity matured at different times and rates. Differences in functional stability of particular outcomes confirm that maturation levels depend on infants' gestational rather than PMA.

Citing Articles

Determination of oral feeding skills in late preterm, early term, and full-term infants using the neonatal oral feeding monitor (NeoSAFE).

Ecevit A, Erdogan B, Anuk Ince D, Aksu M, Unal S, Turan O Ital J Pediatr. 2025; 51(1):38.

PMID: 39920842 PMC: 11806788. DOI: 10.1186/s13052-025-01867-2.


Multi-omics insights into beagle dog fed with a sucking-rewarded automatic feeding device.

Jiao Y, Wang X, Yu A, Wu L, Li H Front Pediatr. 2024; 12:1467581.

PMID: 39670188 PMC: 11634582. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1467581.


A Ducted, Biomimetic Nipple Improves Aspects of Infant Feeding Physiology and Performance in an Animal Model.

Mayerl C, Kaczmarek E, Smith A, Shideler H, Blilie M, Edmonds C Dysphagia. 2024; .

PMID: 39487856 DOI: 10.1007/s00455-024-10780-5.


Method of home tube feeding and 2-3-year neurodevelopmental outcome.

Fisher A, Ermarth A, Ling C, Brinker K, DuPont T J Perinatol. 2024; 44(11):1630-1634.

PMID: 38811755 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-024-02013-2.


Differences in the swallowing process of newborns and healthy preterm infants: first results with a non-invasive bioimpedance and electromyography measurement system.

Hubl N, Riebold B, Schramm D, Seidl R Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023; 281(2):843-854.

PMID: 37996534 PMC: 10796423. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08344-8.


References
1.
Koenig J, Davies A, Thach B . Coordination of breathing, sucking, and swallowing during bottle feedings in human infants. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1990; 69(5):1623-9. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1990.69.5.1623. View

2.
Hanlon M, Tripp J, Ellis R, FLACK F, Selley W, Shoesmith H . Deglutition apnoea as indicator of maturation of suckle feeding in bottle-fed preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997; 39(8):534-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07482.x. View

3.
Hawdon J, Beauregard N, Slattery J, Kennedy G . Identification of neonates at risk of developing feeding problems in infancy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000; 42(4):235-9. DOI: 10.1017/s0012162200000402. View

4.
Gewolb I, Vice F, Taciak V, BOSMA J . Developmental patterns of rhythmic suck and swallow in preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001; 43(1):22-7. DOI: 10.1017/s0012162201000044. View

5.
Tanaka S, Kogo M, Chandler S, Matsuya T . Localization of oral-motor rhythmogenic circuits in the isolated rat brainstem preparation. Brain Res. 1999; 821(1):190-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)01117-8. View