The Impact of Genetic Diversity on the Accuracy of DNA Barcoding to Identify Species: A Study on the Genus
Overview
Affiliations
DNA barcoding is widely used in species identification, but there is considerable controversy regarding the extent of sampling in research methods. Some scholars have proposed that this small sample size underestimates the intraspecific genetic diversity, which would impact on the accuracy of DNA barcoding to identify species. In study, we selected all species (including Rupr., Schneid., and var. Schneid.) as the materials, collected 59 samples from 35 populations greatly to represent the genetic diversity, and analyzed the haplotype, genetic distance, barcoding gap, and Neighbor-Joining (NJ) trees based on AH and internal transcribed spacer gene sequences. Additionally, a sampling simulation was conducted to assess the correlation between genetic diversity and the number of populations. Finally, analysis of critical geographical populations was performed. Based on analysis of haplotype, genetic distance, barcoding gap, and NJ trees, we found that eight samples impacted on the effectiveness of DNA barcoding, which genetic information were very important to identify species. Moreover, the result of the NJ tree analysis performed the small-scale sample size did not completely match the objective phylogenetic relationship in . In simulation sampling analysis, the data showed the genetic diversity indexes at the same population level gradually decreased and stabilized as the number of simulation sampling populations increased. We found that 1-2 samples from over 24 populations based on uniform geographical distribution could represent 80% of the genetic diversity of and ensure authenticity and reliability of DNA barcoding. Thus, we proposed it is particularly important adequately samples to cover infraspecific genetic diversity in order to ensure identification accuracy of DNA barcoding.
Nazar N, Saxena A, Sebastian A, Slater A, Sundaresan V, Sgamma T Phytochem Anal. 2024; 36(1):7-29.
PMID: 39532481 PMC: 11743069. DOI: 10.1002/pca.3466.
Mohd Salleh M, Esa Y, Mohamed R Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(11).
PMID: 37889683 PMC: 10251852. DOI: 10.3390/ani13111720.
Kang Y, Liu P, Lv F, Zhang Y, Yang Y, Wei J PLoS One. 2022; 17(6):e0270167.
PMID: 35709217 PMC: 9202955. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270167.
The complete chloroplast genome of (Rutaceae), an Endangered medicinal plant in southern China.
Yang N, Liu Q, Zhao L Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2020; 5(3):3786-3788.
PMID: 33367103 PMC: 7703704. DOI: 10.1080/23802359.2020.1837688.
Zhang Z, Wang X, Zhang Z, Yao H, Zhang X, Zhang Y Ecol Evol. 2019; 9(18):10723-10733.
PMID: 31624576 PMC: 6787823. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5590.