MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods

Overview

Journal Mol Biol Evol

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialty Biology

Date 2011 May 7

PMID 21546353

Citations 13790

Authors

Koichiro Tamura

Daniel Peterson

Nicholas Peterson

Glen Stecher

Masatoshi Nei

Sudhir Kumar

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Comparative analysis of molecular sequence data is essential for reconstructing the evolutionary histories of species and inferring the nature and extent of selective forces shaping the evolution of genes and species. Here, we announce the release of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 5 (MEGA5), which is a user-friendly software for mining online databases, building sequence alignments and phylogenetic trees, and using methods of evolutionary bioinformatics in basic biology, biomedicine, and evolution. The newest addition in MEGA5 is a collection of maximum likelihood (ML) analyses for inferring evolutionary trees, selecting best-fit substitution models (nucleotide or amino acid), inferring ancestral states and sequences (along with probabilities), and estimating evolutionary rates site-by-site. In computer simulation analyses, ML tree inference algorithms in MEGA5 compared favorably with other software packages in terms of computational efficiency and the accuracy of the estimates of phylogenetic trees, substitution parameters, and rate variation among sites. The MEGA user interface has now been enhanced to be activity driven to make it easier for the use of both beginners and experienced scientists. This version of MEGA is intended for the Windows platform, and it has been configured for effective use on Mac OS X and Linux desktops. It is available free of charge from http://www.megasoftware.net.

Citing Articles

Identification, distribution and ultramorphology of the larvae of Gynaephora menyuanensis (Lepidoptera: Lymantriinae) endemic to Qinghai-Tibet plateau.

Yuan C, Liu Y, Shao H, Fu J, Liu S Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8889.

PMID: 40087332 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-93345-2.

Mutations in the signal peptide of effector gene Pi04314 contribute to the adaptive evolution of the Phytophthora infestans.

Ouyang H, Wang Y, He M, Wu E, Hu B, Zhan J BMC Ecol Evol. 2025; 25(1):21.

PMID: 40082776 PMC: 11907978. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-025-02360-4.

Phylogenetic, Structural, and Evolutionary Insights into Pepper NBS-LRR Resistance Genes.

Liu J, Cheng Y, Ruan M, Ye Q, Wang R, Yao Z Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(5).

PMID: 40076456 PMC: 11899730. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26051828.

A single-cell transcriptomic atlas reveals the cell differentiation trajectory and the response to virus invasion in swelling clove of garlic.

Gao S, Li F, Zeng Z, He Q, Mostafa H, Zhang S Hortic Res. 2025; 12(4):uhae365.

PMID: 40070403 PMC: 11894531. DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhae365.

Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus, northwestern of Iran.

Soozangar N, Jeddi F, Spotin A, Molaei S, Mohammadi-Ghalehbin B, Habibzadeh S BMC Infect Dis. 2025; 25(1):316.

PMID: 40045205 PMC: 11883951. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-025-10728-6.

References

Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T . Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol. 1985; 22(2):160-74. DOI: 10.1007/BF02101694. View

Felsenstein J . Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 1981; 17(6):368-76. DOI: 10.1007/BF01734359. View

Takezaki N, Rzhetsky A, Nei M . Phylogenetic test of the molecular clock and linearized trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1995; 12(5):823-33. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040259. View

Alfaro M, Huelsenbeck J . Comparative performance of Bayesian and AIC-based measures of phylogenetic model uncertainty. Syst Biol. 2006; 55(1):89-96. DOI: 10.1080/10635150500433565. View

Gascuel O . BIONJ: an improved version of the NJ algorithm based on a simple model of sequence data. Mol Biol Evol. 1997; 14(7):685-95. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025808. View

Saitou N, Nei M . The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987; 4(4):406-25. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. View

Yang Z . Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J Mol Evol. 1994; 39(3):306-14. DOI: 10.1007/BF00160154. View

Schrago C . An empirical examination of the standard errors of maximum likelihood phylogenetic parameters under the molecular clock via bootstrapping. Genet Mol Res. 2006; 5(1):233-41. View

Posada D, Crandall K . MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 1999; 14(9):817-8. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817. View

10.

Stamatakis A . RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2006; 22(21):2688-90. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446. View

11.

Kumar S, Nei M, Dudley J, Tamura K . MEGA: a biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief Bioinform. 2008; 9(4):299-306. PMC: 2562624. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbn017. View

12.

Jones D, Taylor W, Thornton J . The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci. 1992; 8(3):275-82. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/8.3.275. View

13.

Tamura K, Nei M, Kumar S . Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(30):11030-5. PMC: 491989. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0404206101. View

14.

Posada D, Buckley T . Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of akaike information criterion and bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst Biol. 2004; 53(5):793-808. DOI: 10.1080/10635150490522304. View

15.

Rosenberg M, Kumar S . Incomplete taxon sampling is not a problem for phylogenetic inference. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(19):10751-6. PMC: 58547. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.191248498. View

16.

Rosenberg M, Kumar S . Heterogeneity of nucleotide frequencies among evolutionary lineages and phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol. 2003; 20(4):610-21. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg067. View

17.

Kumar S, Dudley J . Bioinformatics software for biologists in the genomics era. Bioinformatics. 2007; 23(14):1713-7. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm239. View

18.

Ripplinger J, Sullivan J . Assessment of substitution model adequacy using frequentist and Bayesian methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2010; 27(12):2790-803. PMC: 2981515. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msq168. View

19.

Mayrose I, Mitchell A, Pupko T . Site-specific evolutionary rate inference: taking phylogenetic uncertainty into account. J Mol Evol. 2005; 60(3):345-53. DOI: 10.1007/s00239-004-0183-8. View

20.

Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M . MEGA: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software for microcomputers. Comput Appl Biosci. 1994; 10(2):189-91. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/10.2.189. View