» Articles » PMID: 31620829

Current Challenges: the Ups and Downs of TACS

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2019 Oct 18
PMID 31620829
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The non-invasive delivery of electric currents through the scalp (transcranial electrical stimulation) is a popular tool for neuromodulation, mostly due to its highly adaptable nature (waveform, montage) and tolerability at low intensities (< 2 mA). Applied rhythmically, transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) may entrain neural oscillations in a frequency- and phase-specific manner, providing a causal perspective on brain-behaviour relationships. While the past decade has seen many behavioural and electrophysiological effects of tACS that suggest entrainment-mediated effects in the brain, it has been difficult to reconcile such reports with the weak intracranial field strengths (< 1 V/m) achievable at conventional intensities. In this review, we first describe the ongoing challenges faced by users of tACS. We outline the biophysics of electrical brain stimulation and the factors that contribute to the weak field intensities achievable in the brain. Since the applied current predominantly shunts through the scalp-stimulating the nerves that innervate it-the plausibility of transcutaneous (rather than transcranial) effects of tACS is also discussed. In examining the effects of tACS on brain activity, the complex problem of salvaging electrophysiological recordings from artefacts of tACS is described. Nevertheless, these challenges by no means mark the rise and fall of tACS: the second part of this review outlines the recent advancements in the field. We describe some ways in which artefacts of tACS may be better managed using high-frequency protocols, and describe innovative methods for current interactions within the brain that offer either dynamic or more focal current distributions while also minimising transcutaneous effects.

Citing Articles

μ-Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Induces Phasic Entrainment and Plastic Facilitation of Corticospinal Excitability.

Geffen A, Bland N, Sale M Eur J Neurosci. 2025; 61(5):e70042.

PMID: 40040311 PMC: 11880748. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.70042.


Modulation of vigilance/alertness using beta (30 Hz) transcranial alternating current stimulation.

Chu Z, Wang R, Zhou T Front Neurosci. 2025; 19:1445006.

PMID: 40018360 PMC: 11865085. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1445006.


What can neurofeedback and transcranial alternating current stimulation reveal about cross-frequency coupling?.

Orendacova M, Kvasnak E Front Neurosci. 2025; 19:1465773.

PMID: 40012676 PMC: 11861218. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1465773.


Connectivity changes following transcranial alternating current stimulation at 5-Hz: an EEG study.

Lee T, Tramontano G AIMS Neurosci. 2025; 11(4):439-448.

PMID: 39801795 PMC: 11712229. DOI: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2024026.


Evaluation of tolerability and safety of transcranial electrical stimulation with gel particle electrodes in healthy subjects.

Chang C, Piao Y, Zhang M, Liu Y, Du M, Yang M Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1441533.

PMID: 39606007 PMC: 11599605. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1441533.


References
1.
Ruffini G, Wendling F, Merlet I, Molaee-Ardekani B, Mekonnen A, Salvador R . Transcranial current brain stimulation (tCS): models and technologies. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012; 21(3):333-45. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2200046. View

2.
Hanslmayr S, Matuschek J, Fellner M . Entrainment of prefrontal beta oscillations induces an endogenous echo and impairs memory formation. Curr Biol. 2014; 24(8):904-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.007. View

3.
Bestmann S, de Berker A, Bonaiuto J . Understanding the behavioural consequences of noninvasive brain stimulation. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014; 19(1):13-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.10.003. View

4.
Chander B, Witkowski M, Braun C, Robinson S, Born J, Cohen L . tACS Phase Locking of Frontal Midline Theta Oscillations Disrupts Working Memory Performance. Front Cell Neurosci. 2016; 10:120. PMC: 4858529. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2016.00120. View

5.
Chhatbar P, Kautz S, Takacs I, Rowland N, Revuelta G, George M . Evidence of transcranial direct current stimulation-generated electric fields at subthalamic level in human brain in vivo. Brain Stimul. 2018; 11(4):727-733. PMC: 6019625. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.03.006. View