What Can Neurofeedback and Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Reveal About Cross-frequency Coupling?

Overview

Journal Front Neurosci

Date 2025 Feb 27

PMID 40012676

Authors

Maria Orendacova

Eugen Kvasnak

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In recent years, the dynamics and function of cross-frequency coupling (CFC) in electroencephalography (EEG) have emerged as a prevalent area of investigation within the research community. One possible approach in studying CFC is to utilize non-invasive neuromodulation methods such as transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and neurofeedback (NFB). In this study, we address (1) the potential applicability of single and multifrequency tACS and NFB protocols in CFC research; (2) the prevalence of CFC types, such as phase-amplitude or amplitude-amplitude CFC, in tACS and NFB studies; and (3) factors that contribute to inter- and intraindividual variability in CFC and ways to address them potentially. Here we analyzed research studies on CFC, tACS, and neurofeedback. Based on current knowledge, CFC types have been reported in tACS and NFB studies. We hypothesize that direct and indirect effects of tACS and neurofeedback can induce CFC. Several variability factors such as health status, age, fatigue, personality traits, and eyes-closed (EC) vs. eyes-open (EO)condition may influence the CFC types. Modifying the duration of the tACS and neurofeedback intervention and selecting a specific demographic experimental group could reduce these sources of CFC variability. Neurofeedback and tACS appear to be promising tools for studying CFC.

References

Liang Z, Ren N, Wen X, Li H, Guo H, Ma Y . Age-dependent cross frequency coupling features from children to adults during general anesthesia. Neuroimage. 2021; 240:118372. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118372. View

Neuling T, Wagner S, Wolters C, Zaehle T, Herrmann C . Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACS. Front Psychiatry. 2012; 3:83. PMC: 3449241. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00083. View

Izutsu N, Yanagisawa T, Fukuma R, Kishima H . Magnetoencephalographic neurofeedback training decreases-low-phase-amplitude coupling of the motor cortex of healthy adults: a double-blinded randomized crossover feasibility study. J Neural Eng. 2023; 20(3). DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/acd0d6. View

Klimesch W . EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1999; 29(2-3):169-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00056-3. View

Dessy E, Mairesse O, Van Puyvelde M, Cortoos A, Neyt X, Pattyn N . Train Your Brain? Can We Really Selectively Train Specific EEG Frequencies With Neurofeedback Training. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020; 14:22. PMC: 7077336. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00022. View

Groppe D, Bickel S, Keller C, Jain S, Hwang S, Harden C . Dominant frequencies of resting human brain activity as measured by the electrocorticogram. Neuroimage. 2013; 79:223-33. PMC: 4269223. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.044. View

de la Salle S, Choueiry J, Payumo M, Devlin M, Noel C, Abozmal A . Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Alters Auditory Steady-State Oscillatory Rhythms and Their Cross-Frequency Couplings. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2023; 55(3):329-339. PMC: 11020127. DOI: 10.1177/15500594231179679. View

Escolano C, Olivan B, Lopez-Del-Hoyo Y, Garcia-Campayo J, Minguez J . Double-blind single-session neurofeedback training in upper-alpha for cognitive enhancement of healthy subjects. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013; 2012:4643-7. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347002. View

Shi W, Yeh C, Hong Y . Cross-Frequency Transfer Entropy Characterize Coupling of Interacting Nonlinear Oscillators in Complex Systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018; 66(2):521-529. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2849823. View

10.

Lee J, Whittington M, Kopell N . Top-down beta rhythms support selective attention via interlaminar interaction: a model. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013; 9(8):e1003164. PMC: 3738471. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003164. View

11.

LUBAR J, Shouse M . EEG and behavioral changes in a hyperkinetic child concurrent with training of the sensorimotor rhythm (SMR): a preliminary report. Biofeedback Self Regul. 1976; 1(3):293-306. DOI: 10.1007/BF01001170. View

12.

Hyafil A . Misidentifications of specific forms of cross-frequency coupling: three warnings. Front Neurosci. 2015; 9:370. PMC: 4598949. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00370. View

13.

Gruzelier J . Differential effects on mood of 12-15 (SMR) and 15-18 (beta1) Hz neurofeedback. Int J Psychophysiol. 2013; 93(1):112-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.11.007. View

14.

Bagherzadeh Y, Baldauf D, Pantazis D, Desimone R . Alpha Synchrony and the Neurofeedback Control of Spatial Attention. Neuron. 2019; 105(3):577-587.e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.11.001. View

15.

Prim J, Ahn S, Davila M, Alexander M, McCulloch K, Frohlich F . Targeting the Autonomic Nervous System Balance in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Using Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation: A Randomized, Crossover, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study. J Pain Res. 2019; 12:3265-3277. PMC: 6912089. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S208030. View

16.

Pimenta M, van Run C, De Fockert J, Gruzelier J . Neurofeedback of SMR and Beta1 Frequencies: An Investigation of Learning Indices and Frequency-Specific Effects. Neuroscience. 2017; 378:211-224. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.07.056. View

17.

Lisman J, Jensen O . The θ-γ neural code. Neuron. 2013; 77(6):1002-16. PMC: 3648857. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.007. View

18.

ODoherty J . Reward representations and reward-related learning in the human brain: insights from neuroimaging. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004; 14(6):769-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2004.10.016. View

19.

Helfrich R, Schneider T, Rach S, Trautmann-Lengsfeld S, Engel A, Herrmann C . Entrainment of brain oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation. Curr Biol. 2014; 24(3):333-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.041. View

20.

Wischnewski M, Engelhardt M, Salehinejad M, Schutter D, Kuo M, Nitsche M . NMDA Receptor-Mediated Motor Cortex Plasticity After 20 Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation. Cereb Cortex. 2018; 29(7):2924-2931. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhy160. View