» Articles » PMID: 31615854

Reversal Learning in Larvae

Overview
Journal Learn Mem
Specialty Neurology
Date 2019 Oct 17
PMID 31615854
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Adjusting behavior to changed environmental contingencies is critical for survival, and reversal learning provides an experimental handle on such cognitive flexibility. Here, we investigate reversal learning in larval Using odor-taste associations, we establish olfactory reversal learning in the appetitive and the aversive domain, using either fructose as a reward or high-concentration sodium chloride as a punishment, respectively. Reversal learning is demonstrated both in differential and in absolute conditioning, in either valence domain. In differential conditioning, the animals are first trained such that an odor A is paired, for example, with the reward whereas odor B is not (A+/B); this is followed by a second training phase with reversed contingencies (A/B+). In absolute conditioning, odor B is omitted, such that the animals are first trained with paired presentations of A and reward, followed by unpaired training in the second training phase. Our results reveal "true" reversal learning in that the opposite associative effects of both the first and the second training phase are detectable after reversed-contingency training. In what is a surprisingly quick, one-trial contingency adjustment in the larva, the present study establishes a simple and genetically easy accessible study case of cognitive flexibility.

Citing Articles

Drosophila larvae form appetitive and aversive associative memory in response to thermal conditioning.

Polizos N, Dancausse S, Rios C, Klein M PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0303955.

PMID: 39316589 PMC: 11421805. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303955.


Goal-directed behavior in Tenebrio molitor larvae.

Dissegna A, Turatto M, Chiandetti C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):21706.

PMID: 39289503 PMC: 11408670. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-72455-3.


Cognitive limits of larval : testing for conditioned inhibition, sensory preconditioning, and second-order conditioning.

Sen E, El-Keredy A, Jacob N, Mancini N, Asnaz G, Widmann A Learn Mem. 2024; 31(5).

PMID: 38862170 PMC: 11199949. DOI: 10.1101/lm.053726.122.


Prediction error drives associative learning and conditioned behavior in a spiking model of Drosophila larva.

Jurgensen A, Sakagiannis P, Schleyer M, Gerber B, Nawrot M iScience. 2024; 27(1):108640.

PMID: 38292165 PMC: 10824792. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108640.


Idiosyncratic learning performance in flies.

Smith M, Honegger K, Turner G, de Bivort B Biol Lett. 2022; 18(2):20210424.

PMID: 35104427 PMC: 8807056. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2021.0424.


References
1.
Stalnaker T, Takahashi Y, Roesch M, Schoenbaum G . Neural substrates of cognitive inflexibility after chronic cocaine exposure. Neuropharmacology. 2008; 56 Suppl 1:63-72. PMC: 2647515. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.07.019. View

2.
Jacobson A . Learning in flatworms and annelids. Psychol Bull. 1963; 60:74-94. DOI: 10.1037/h0046468. View

3.
Michels B, Saumweber T, Biernacki R, Thum J, Glasgow R, Schleyer M . Pavlovian Conditioning of Larval : An Illustrated, Multilingual, Hands-On Manual for Odor-Taste Associative Learning in Maggots. Front Behav Neurosci. 2017; 11:45. PMC: 5395560. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00045. View

4.
Diegelmann S, Klagges B, Michels B, Schleyer M, Gerber B . Maggot learning and Synapsin function. J Exp Biol. 2013; 216(Pt 6):939-51. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.076208. View

5.
Atlas L, Phelps E . Prepared stimuli enhance aversive learning without weakening the impact of verbal instructions. Learn Mem. 2018; 25(2):100-104. PMC: 5772389. DOI: 10.1101/lm.046359.117. View