» Articles » PMID: 31603939

Influence of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Cardiac Vagal Activity: Not Different from Sham Stimulation and No Effect of Stimulation Intensity

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2019 Oct 12
PMID 31603939
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on cardiac vagal activity, the activity of the vagus nerve regulating cardiac functioning. We applied stimulation on the left cymba conchae and tested the effects of different stimulation intensities on a vagally-mediated heart rate variability pagerameter (i.e., the root mean square of successive differences) as well as on subjective ratings of strength of perceived stimulation intensity and unpleasantness due to the stimulation. Three experiments (within-subject designs, M = 61 healthy participants each) were carried out: In Experiment 1, to choose one fixed stimulation intensity for the subsequent studies, we compared three preset stimulation intensities (i.e., 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 mA) with each other. In Experiment 2, we compared the set stimulation method with the free stimulation method, in which the participants were instructed to freely choose an intensity. In Experiment 3, to control for placebo effects, we compared both methods (i.e., set stimulation vs. free stimulation) with their respective sham stimulations. In the three experiments, an increase of cardiac vagal activity was found from resting to the stimulation phases. However, this increase in cardiac vagal activity was not dependent on stimulation intensity (Experiment 1), the method used to stimulate (i.e., set vs. free; Experiment 2), or whether stimulation was active or sham (Experiment 3). This pattern of results was solidly supported by Bayesian estimations. On the subjective level, higher stimulation intensities were perceived as significantly stronger and a stronger stimulation was generally also perceived as more unpleasant. The results suggest that cardiac vagal activity may be similarly influenced by afferent vagal stimuli triggered by active and sham stimulation with different stimulation intensities. Potential explanations for these findings and its implications for future research with tVNS are discussed.

Citing Articles

Non-Invasive Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Decreases Heart Rate Variability Independent of Caloric Load.

Kaduk K, Petrella A, Muller S, Koenig J, Kroemer N Psychophysiology. 2025; 62(2):e70017.

PMID: 40007175 PMC: 11862327. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.70017.


The impact of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on anterior cingulate cortex activity in a cognitive control task.

Sonmez O, Holstein E, Puschmann S, Schmitt T, Witt K, Thiel C Psychophysiology. 2025; 62(1):e14739.

PMID: 39780300 PMC: 11711293. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14739.


Differential analgesic effects of high-frequency or accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation of M1 on experimental tonic pain: Correlations with cortical activity changes assessed by TMS-EEG.

Tan B, Chen J, Liu Y, Lin Q, Wang Y, Shi S Neurotherapeutics. 2024; 21(6):e00451.

PMID: 39304439 PMC: 11585887. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurot.2024.e00451.


Can transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation mitigate vigilance loss? Examining the effects of stimulation at individualized versus constant current intensity.

Luna F, Lupianez J, Konig S, Garscha U, Fischer R Psychophysiology. 2024; 62(1):e14670.

PMID: 39169561 PMC: 11775886. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14670.


Transcutaneous cervical vagus nerve stimulation improves sensory performance in humans: a randomized controlled crossover pilot study.

Jigo M, Carmel J, Wang Q, Rodenkirch C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):3975.

PMID: 38368486 PMC: 10874458. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54026-8.


References
1.
Heathers J . Sympathovagal balance from heart rate variability: an obituary. Exp Physiol. 2012; 97(4):556. DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.2011.063867. View

2.
Laborde S, Mosley E, Thayer J . Heart Rate Variability and Cardiac Vagal Tone in Psychophysiological Research - Recommendations for Experiment Planning, Data Analysis, and Data Reporting. Front Psychol. 2017; 8:213. PMC: 5316555. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00213. View

3.
van Leusden J, Sellaro R, Colzato L . Transcutaneous Vagal Nerve Stimulation (tVNS): a new neuromodulation tool in healthy humans?. Front Psychol. 2015; 6:102. PMC: 4322601. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00102. View

4.
De Couck M, Cserjesi R, Caers R, Zijlstra W, Widjaja D, Wolf N . Effects of short and prolonged transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on heart rate variability in healthy subjects. Auton Neurosci. 2016; 203:88-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.autneu.2016.11.003. View

5.
Beste C, Steenbergen L, Sellaro R, Grigoriadou S, Zhang R, Chmielewski W . Effects of Concomitant Stimulation of the GABAergic and Norepinephrine System on Inhibitory Control - A Study Using Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2016; 9(6):811-818. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.07.004. View