Expiratory-gated Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) Does Not Further Augment Heart Rate Variability During Slow Breathing at 0.1 Hz

Overview

Journal Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback

Publisher Springer

Date 2023 Mar 15

PMID 36920567

Authors

Mikolaj Tytus Szulczewski

Martina DAgostini

Ilse Van Diest

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

As cardiac vagal control is a hallmark of good health and self-regulatory capacity, researchers are seeking ways to increase vagally mediated heart rate variability (vmHRV) in an accessible and non-invasive way. Findings with transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) have been disappointing in this respect, as its effects on vmHRV are inconsistent at best. It has been speculated that combining taVNS with other established ways to increase vmHRV may produce synergistic effects. To test this idea, the present study combined taVNS with slow breathing in a cross-over design. A total of 22 participants took part in two sessions of breathing at 6 breaths/min: once combined with taVNS, and once combined with sham stimulation. Electrical stimulation (100 Hz, 400 µs) was applied during expiration, either to the tragus and cavum conchae (taVNS) or to the earlobe (sham). ECG was recorded during baseline, 20-minutes of stimulation, and the recovery period. Frequentist and Bayesian analyses showed no effect of taVNS (in comparison to sham stimulation) on the root mean square of successive differences between normal heartbeats, mean inter-beat interval, or spectral power of heart rate variability at a breathing frequency of 0.1 Hz. These findings suggest that expiratory-gated taVNS combined with the stimulation parameters examined here does not produce acute effects on vmHRV during slow breathing.

References

Russo M, Santarelli D, ORourke D . The physiological effects of slow breathing in the healthy human. Breathe (Sheff). 2017; 13(4):298-309. PMC: 5709795. DOI: 10.1183/20734735.009817. View

Frokjaer J, Bergmann S, Brock C, Madzak A, Farmer A, Ellrich J . Modulation of vagal tone enhances gastroduodenal motility and reduces somatic pain sensitivity. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016; 28(4):592-8. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12760. View

Pumprla J, Howorka K, Groves D, Chester M, Nolan J . Functional assessment of heart rate variability: physiological basis and practical applications. Int J Cardiol. 2002; 84(1):1-14. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5273(02)00057-8. View

Sclocco R, Garcia R, Kettner N, Fisher H, Isenburg K, Makarovsky M . Stimulus frequency modulates brainstem response to respiratory-gated transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2020; 13(4):970-978. PMC: 7931850. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.03.011. View

Szulczewski M . Training of paced breathing at 0.1 Hz improves CO2 homeostasis and relaxation during a paced breathing task. PLoS One. 2019; 14(6):e0218550. PMC: 6586331. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218550. View

Guo Y, Stein P . Circadian rhythm in the cardiovascular system: chronocardiology. Am Heart J. 2003; 145(5):779-86. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8703(02)94797-6. View

Tracy L, Ioannou L, Baker K, Gibson S, Georgiou-Karistianis N, Giummarra M . Meta-analytic evidence for decreased heart rate variability in chronic pain implicating parasympathetic nervous system dysregulation. Pain. 2015; 157(1):7-29. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000360. View

Kreisberg E, Esmaeilpour Z, Adair D, Khadka N, Datta A, Badran B . High-resolution computational modeling of the current flow in the outer ear during transcutaneous auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS). Brain Stimul. 2021; 14(6):1419-1430. PMC: 8608747. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.09.001. View

Burger A, DAgostini M, Verkuil B, Van Diest I . Moving beyond belief: A narrative review of potential biomarkers for transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation. Psychophysiology. 2020; 57(6):e13571. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13571. View

10.

Wolf V, Kuhnel A, Teckentrup V, Koenig J, Kroemer N . Does transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation affect vagally mediated heart rate variability? A living and interactive Bayesian meta-analysis. Psychophysiology. 2021; 58(11):e13933. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13933. View

11.

Grote V, Kelz C, Goswami N, Stossier H, Tafeit E, Moser M . Cardio-autonomic control and wellbeing due to oscillating color light exposure. Physiol Behav. 2013; 114-115:55-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.03.007. View

12.

Lehrer P, Vaschillo E, Trost Z, France C . Effects of rhythmical muscle tension at 0.1Hz on cardiovascular resonance and the baroreflex. Biol Psychol. 2009; 81(1):24-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.01.003. View

13.

Shaffer F, Ginsberg J . An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms. Front Public Health. 2017; 5:258. PMC: 5624990. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258. View

14.

Noble D, Hochman S . Hypothesis: Pulmonary Afferent Activity Patterns During Slow, Deep Breathing Contribute to the Neural Induction of Physiological Relaxation. Front Physiol. 2019; 10:1176. PMC: 6753868. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01176. View

15.

Michopoulos V, Powers A, Gillespie C, Ressler K, Jovanovic T . Inflammation in Fear- and Anxiety-Based Disorders: PTSD, GAD, and Beyond. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016; 42(1):254-270. PMC: 5143487. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2016.146. View

16.

Garcia R, Lin R, Lee J, Kim J, Barbieri R, Sclocco R . Modulation of brainstem activity and connectivity by respiratory-gated auricular vagal afferent nerve stimulation in migraine patients. Pain. 2017; 158(8):1461-1472. PMC: 5517046. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000930. View

17.

Juel J, Brock C, Olesen S, Madzak A, Farmer A, Aziz Q . Acute physiological and electrical accentuation of vagal tone has no effect on pain or gastrointestinal motility in chronic pancreatitis. J Pain Res. 2017; 10:1347-1355. PMC: 5459955. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S133438. View

18.

Keute M, Machetanz K, Berelidze L, Guggenberger R, Gharabaghi A . Neuro-cardiac coupling predicts transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation effects. Brain Stimul. 2021; 14(2):209-216. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.01.001. View

19.

Veiz E, Kieslich S, Staab J, Czesnik D, Herrmann-Lingen C, Meyer T . Men Show Reduced Cardiac Baroreceptor Sensitivity during Modestly Painful Electrical Stimulation of the Forearm: Exploratory Results from a Sham-Controlled Crossover Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(21). PMC: 8582936. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182111193. View

20.

Perna G, Riva A, Defillo A, Sangiorgio E, Nobile M, Caldirola D . Heart rate variability: Can it serve as a marker of mental health resilience?: Special Section on "Translational and Neuroscience Studies in Affective Disorders" Section Editor, Maria Nobile MD, PhD. J Affect Disord. 2019; 263:754-761. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.10.017. View