» Articles » PMID: 36009101

Effects of Stimulus Frequency, Intensity, and Sex on the Autonomic Response to Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation

Overview
Journal Brain Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Aug 26
PMID 36009101
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to determine how transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) alters autonomic nervous activity by comparing the effects of different tVNS frequencies and current intensities. We also investigated the sex-dependent autonomic response to tVNS. Thirty-five healthy adult participants were stimulated using a tVNS stimulator at the left cymba conchae while sitting on a reclining chair; tVNS-induced waveform changes were then recorded for different stimulus frequencies (Experiment 1: 3.0 mA at 100 Hz, 25 Hz, 10 Hz, 1 Hz, and 0 Hz (no stimulation)) and current intensities (Experiment 2: 100 Hz at 3.0 mA, 1.0 mA, 0.2 mA (below sensory threshold), and 0 mA (no stimulation)) using an electrocardiogram. Pulse widths were set at 250 µs in both experiment 1 and 2. Changes in heart rate (HR), root-mean-square of the difference between two successive R waves (RMSSD), and the ratio between low-frequency (LF) (0.04-0.15 Hz) and high-frequency (HF) (0.15-0.40 Hz) bands (LF/HF) in spectral analysis, which indicates sympathetic and parasympathetic activity, respectively, in heart rate variability (HRV), were recorded for analysis. Although stimulation at all frequencies significantly reduced HR ( = 0.001), stimulation at 100 Hz had the most pronounced effect ( = 0.001) in Experiment 1 and was revealed to be required to deliver at 3.0 mA in Experiment 2 ( = 0.003). Additionally, participants with higher baseline sympathetic activity experienced higher parasympathetic response during stimulation, and sex differences may exist in the autonomic responses by the application of tVNS. Therefore, our findings suggest that optimal autonomic changes induced by tVNS to the left cymba conchae vary depending on stimulating parameters and sex.

Citing Articles

Effects of cervical transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (ctVNS) on military cognitive performance during sleep deprivation.

Bottenheft C, Fonken Y, Hendrikse L, Koedijk M, Landman A, Binsch O Front Physiol. 2025; 16:1542791.

PMID: 40078370 PMC: 11897260. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1542791.


Acute transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation modulates presynaptic SV2A density in healthy rat brain: An in vivo microPET study.

Binda K, Real C, Simonsen M, Grove E, Bender D, Gjedde A Psychophysiology. 2024; 62(1):e14709.

PMID: 39428713 PMC: 11775880. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14709.


Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation can modulate fronto-parietal brain networks.

Han S, Shim L, Lee H, Park M Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1368754.

PMID: 39091347 PMC: 11292796. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1368754.


Cardiopulmonary and metabolic responses during a 2-day CPET in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: translating reduced oxygen consumption to impairment status to treatment considerations.

Keller B, Receno C, Franconi C, Harenberg S, Stevens J, Mao X J Transl Med. 2024; 22(1):627.

PMID: 38965566 PMC: 11229500. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05410-5.


Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation improves Long COVID symptoms in a female cohort: a pilot study.

Zheng Z, Simonian N, Wang J, Rosario E Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1393371.

PMID: 38756213 PMC: 11097097. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1393371.


References
1.
Mukai H, Kimoto T, Hojo Y, Kawato S, Murakami G, Higo S . Modulation of synaptic plasticity by brain estrogen in the hippocampus. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009; 1800(10):1030-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.11.002. View

2.
Hays S, Rennaker R, Kilgard M . Targeting plasticity with vagus nerve stimulation to treat neurological disease. Prog Brain Res. 2013; 207:275-99. PMC: 4615598. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63327-9.00010-2. View

3.
Machetanz K, Berelidze L, Guggenberger R, Gharabaghi A . Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation and heart rate variability: Analysis of parameters and targets. Auton Neurosci. 2021; 236:102894. DOI: 10.1016/j.autneu.2021.102894. View

4.
Henssen D, Derks B, van Doorn M, Verhoogt N, Staats P, Vissers K . Visualizing the trigeminovagal complex in the human medulla by combining ex-vivo ultra-high resolution structural MRI and polarized light imaging microscopy. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):11305. PMC: 6683146. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-47855-5. View

5.
Ghani S, Vilensky J, Turner B, Tubbs R, Loukas M . Meta-analysis of vagus nerve stimulation treatment for epilepsy: correlation between device setting parameters and acute response. Childs Nerv Syst. 2015; 31(12):2291-304. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-015-2921-1. View