Age of Acquisition Impacts the Brain Differently Depending on Neuroanatomical Metric
Overview
Affiliations
Although researchers generally agree that a certain set of brain areas underlie bilingual language processing, there is discrepancy regarding what effect timing of language acquisition has on these regions. We aimed to investigate the neuroanatomical correlates of age of acquisition (AoA), which has been examined previously, but with inconsistent results, likely influenced by methodological differences across studies. We analyzed gray matter density, volume, and thickness using whole-brain linear models in 334 bilinguals and monolinguals. Neuroanatomical correlates of AoA differed depending on gray matter metric. Relative to early bilinguals, late bilinguals had thicker cortex in language processing and cognitive control regions, and greater density in multiple frontal areas and the right middle temporal and supramarginal gyri. Early bilinguals had greater volume than late bilinguals in the left middle temporal gyrus. Overall, volume was the least sensitive to AoA-related differences. Multiple regions not classically implicated in dual-language processing were also found, which highlights the important role of whole-brain analyses in neuroscience. This is the first study to investigate AoA and gray matter thickness, volume, and density all in the same sample. We conclude that cognitive models of bilingualism should consider the roles of development and neuroanatomical metric in driving our understanding of bilingual and monolingual language organization.
Li X, Ng K, Wong J, Zhou J, Yow W Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):3193.
PMID: 38326334 PMC: 10850089. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-48710-4.
Cortical Thickness Is Related to Variability in Heritage Bilingual Language Proficiency.
Nguyen M, Vaughn K, Claussenius-Kalman H, Archila-Suerte P, Hernandez A Transl Issues Psychol Sci. 2023; 9(4):364-379.
PMID: 38125719 PMC: 10732586. DOI: 10.1037/tps0000362.
Clear Theories Are Needed to Interpret Differences: Perspectives on the Bilingual Advantage Debate.
de Bruin A, Dick A, Carreiras M Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2023; 2(4):433-451.
PMID: 37214628 PMC: 10158573. DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00038.
Zheng Y, Denervaud S, Durrleman S Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 16:1058803.
PMID: 36684844 PMC: 9859714. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1058803.
Bylund E, Antfolk J, Abrahamsson N, Olstad A, Norrman G, Lehtonen M Psychon Bull Rev. 2022; 30(3):897-913.
PMID: 36327027 PMC: 10264296. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02136-7.