Plasticity, Variability and Age in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2018 Mar 30

PMID 29593590

Citations 24

Authors

David Birdsong

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Much of what is known about the outcome of second language acquisition and bilingualism can be summarized in terms of inter-individual variability, plasticity and age. The present review looks at variability and plasticity with respect to their underlying sources, and at age as a modulating factor in variability and plasticity. In this context we consider critical period effects vs. bilingualism effects, early and late bilingualism, nativelike and non-nativelike L2 attainment, cognitive aging, individual differences in learning, and linguistic dominance in bilingualism. Non-uniformity is an inherent characteristic of both early and late bilingualism. This review shows how plasticity and age connect with biological and experiential sources of variability, and underscores the value of research that reveals and explains variability. In these ways the review suggests how plasticity, variability and age conspire to frame fundamental research issues in L2 acquisition and bilingualism, and provides points of reference for discussion of the present Research Topic.

Citing Articles

Toward characterization of perceptual specialization for faces in Multiracial contexts.

Pickron C, Kutlu E Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1392042.

PMID: 39691664 PMC: 11649437. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1392042.

Creating a diagnostic assessment model for autism spectrum disorder by differentiating lexicogrammatical choices through machine learning.

Kato S, Hanawa K, Saito M, Nakamura K PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0311209.

PMID: 39331681 PMC: 11432897. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311209.

Lexically-specific syntactic restrictions in second-language speakers.

Vega-Mendoza M, Ivanova I, McLean J, Pickering M, Branigan H J Mem Lang. 2024; 134.

PMID: 39301181 PMC: 11412610. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2023.104470.

Cortical Thickness Is Related to Variability in Heritage Bilingual Language Proficiency.

Nguyen M, Vaughn K, Claussenius-Kalman H, Archila-Suerte P, Hernandez A Transl Issues Psychol Sci. 2023; 9(4):364-379.

PMID: 38125719 PMC: 10732586. DOI: 10.1037/tps0000362.

Novel sound exposure drives dynamic changes in auditory lateralization that are associated with perceptual learning in zebra finches.

Furest Cataldo B, Yang L, Cabezas B, Ovetsky J, Vicario D Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):1205.

PMID: 38012325 PMC: 10681987. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05567-7.

References

Hakuta K, Bialystok E, Wiley E . Critical evidence: a test of the critical-period hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychol Sci. 2003; 14(1):31-8. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.01415. View

Bosch L, Sebastian-Galles N . Simultaneous bilingualism and the perception of a language-specific vowel contrast in the first year of life. Lang Speech. 2004; 46(Pt 2-3):217-43. DOI: 10.1177/00238309030460020801. View

Pring L . Savant talent. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005; 47(7):500-3. DOI: 10.1017/s0012162205000976. View

Hurford J . The evolution of the critical period for language acquisition. Cognition. 1991; 40(3):159-201. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90024-x. View

Abutalebi J . Neural aspects of second language representation and language control. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008; 128(3):466-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.03.014. View

Kovacs A, Mehler J . Cognitive gains in 7-month-old bilingual infants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(16):6556-60. PMC: 2672482. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0811323106. View

Fowler C, Sramko V, Ostry D, Rowland S, Halle P . Cross language phonetic influences on the speech of French-English bilinguals. J Phon. 2009; 36(4):649-663. PMC: 2598425. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2008.04.001. View

Petitto L, Berens M, Kovelman I, Dubins M, Jasinska K, Shalinsky M . The "Perceptual Wedge Hypothesis" as the basis for bilingual babies' phonetic processing advantage: new insights from fNIRS brain imaging. Brain Lang. 2011; 121(2):130-43. PMC: 3192234. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.05.003. View

Antoniou M, Best C, Tyler M, Kroos C . Language context elicits native-like stop voicing in early bilinguals' productions in both L1 and L2. J Phon. 2011; 38(4):640-653. PMC: 3131106. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.09.005. View

10.

Bialystok E, Craik F, Luk G . Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012; 16(4):240-50. PMC: 3322418. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001. View

11.

Wong P, Morgan-Short K, Ettlinger M, Zheng J . Linking neurogenetics and individual differences in language learning: the dopamine hypothesis. Cortex. 2012; 48(9):1091-102. PMC: 3965203. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.03.017. View

12.

Antoniou M, Best C, Tyler M, Kroos C . Inter-language interference in VOT production by L2-dominant bilinguals: Asymmetries in phonetic code-switching. J Phon. 2012; 39(4):558-570. PMC: 3391600. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.03.001. View

13.

Antoniou M, Tyler M, Best C . Two ways to listen: Do L2-dominant bilinguals perceive stop voicing according to language mode?. J Phon. 2012; 40(4):582-594. PMC: 3403831. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2012.05.005. View

14.

Della Rosa P, Videsott G, Borsa V, Canini M, Weekes B, Franceschini R . A neural interactive location for multilingual talent. Cortex. 2013; 49(2):605-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.001. View

15.

Vanhove J . The critical period hypothesis in second language acquisition: a statistical critique and a reanalysis. PLoS One. 2013; 8(7):e69172. PMC: 3723803. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069172. View

16.

Marchman V . Constraints on plasticity in a connectionist model of the english past tense. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013; 5(2):215-34. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.2.215. View

17.

Luk G, Bialystok E . Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between language proficiency and usage. J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2013; 25(5):605-621. PMC: 3780436. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2013.795574. View

18.

Grosjean F . Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain Lang. 1989; 36(1):3-15. DOI: 10.1016/0093-934x(89)90048-5. View

19.

Chandrasekaran B, Koslov S, Maddox W . Toward a dual-learning systems model of speech category learning. Front Psychol. 2014; 5:825. PMC: 4116788. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00825. View

20.

Werker J, Hensch T . Critical periods in speech perception: new directions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014; 66:173-96. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015104. View