» Articles » PMID: 28847331

Consequences of Organ Choice in Describing Bacterial Pathogen Assemblages in a Rodent Population

Overview
Date 2017 Aug 30
PMID 28847331
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

High-throughput sequencing technologies now allow for rapid cost-effective surveys of multiple pathogens in many host species including rodents, but it is currently unclear if the organ chosen for screening influences the number and identity of bacteria detected. We used 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing to identify bacterial pathogens in the heart, liver, lungs, kidneys and spleen of 13 water voles (Arvicola terrestris) collected in Franche-Comté, France. We asked if bacterial pathogen assemblages within organs are similar and if all five organs are necessary to detect all of the bacteria present in an individual animal. We identified 24 bacteria representing 17 genera; average bacterial richness for each organ ranged from 1·5 ± 0·4 (mean ± standard error) to 2·5 ± 0·4 bacteria/organ and did not differ significantly between organs. The average bacterial richness when organ assemblages were pooled within animals was 4·7 ± 0·6 bacteria/animal; Operational Taxonomic Unit accumulation analysis indicates that all five organs are required to obtain this. Organ type influences bacterial assemblage composition in a systematic way (PERMANOVA, 999 permutations, pseudo-F 4,51 = 1·37, P = 0·001). Our results demonstrate that the number of organs sampled influences the ability to detect bacterial pathogens, which can inform sampling decisions in public health and wildlife ecology.

Citing Articles

Identification of Pathogenic Serogroup Grippotyphosa in Water Voles () from Ruminant Pastures in Puy-de-Dôme, Central France.

Harran E, Pinot A, Kodjo A, Djelouadji Z, Le Gudayer M, Sionfoungo Daouda S Pathogens. 2023; 12(2).

PMID: 36839532 PMC: 9965961. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12020260.


Weather influences M. arvalis reproduction but not population dynamics in a 17-year time series.

Giraudoux P, Villette P, Quere J, Damange J, Delattre P Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):13942.

PMID: 31558762 PMC: 6763496. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50438-z.

References
1.
Kozich J, Westcott S, Baxter N, Highlander S, Schloss P . Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013; 79(17):5112-20. PMC: 3753973. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01043-13. View

2.
Jones K, Patel N, Levy M, Storeygard A, Balk D, Gittleman J . Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature. 2008; 451(7181):990-3. PMC: 5960580. DOI: 10.1038/nature06536. View

3.
Sheppard M, Webb C, Heath F, Mallows V, Emilianus R, Maskell D . Dynamics of bacterial growth and distribution within the liver during Salmonella infection. Cell Microbiol. 2003; 5(9):593-600. DOI: 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2003.00296.x. View

4.
Beldomenico P, Begon M . Disease spread, susceptibility and infection intensity: vicious circles?. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009; 25(1):21-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.015. View

5.
Razzauti M, Galan M, Bernard M, Maman S, Klopp C, Charbonnel N . A Comparison between Transcriptome Sequencing and 16S Metagenomics for Detection of Bacterial Pathogens in Wildlife. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015; 9(8):e0003929. PMC: 4540314. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003929. View