» Articles » PMID: 31549175

Evaluation of in Ovo Bacillus Spp. Based Probiotic Administration on Horizontal Transmission of Virulent Escherichia Coli in Neonatal Broiler Chickens

Overview
Journal Poult Sci
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2019 Sep 25
PMID 31549175
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of in ovo Bacillus spp. base probiotic (BBP) administration on hatchability, Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) recovery, performance, and microbiota composition in 2 independent trials using a virulent E. coli seeder challenge model. In each trial, one hundred and eighty 18-day-old embryos were allocated into 1 of 2 groups: Control and treated group (inoculated with 107 BBP). On day 19 of embryogenesis, seeder embryos (n = 18) were inoculated with 4.5 × 104E. coli/mL+272 μg/mL tetracycline and segregated into mesh hatching bags. Twelve chicks per group were euthanized at hatch and at day 7 to evaluate the gastrointestinal composition of total GNB or total aerobic pasteurized bacteria. Also, in trial 2, ceca content from five chickens at day 7 were collected to evaluate microbiota composition. Embryos inoculated with BBP showed a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in the total number of GNB at day-of-hatch (DOH) and day 7. Probiotic treatment increased BW at DOH and day 7, and BW gain (days 0 to 7) when compared with Control chickens. Proteobacteria phylum was significantly reduced, while the Firmicutes was significantly increased by the BBP as compared to the Control (P < 0.05). At family level, Enterobacteriaceae was significantly decreased, while the Lachnospiraceae was significantly elevated in the BBP as compared to the Control group (P < 0.05). The genus Oscillospira was significantly enriched in the BBP group, whereas the unidentified genus of family Enterobacteriaceae in the Control group (P < 0.05). The BBP group increased the bacterial species richness, although there was no significant difference between treatments (P > 0.05). Interestingly, beta diversity showed a significant difference in bacterial community structure between Control and BBP groups (P < 0.05). The results of the present study suggest that in ovo administration of a BBP can reduce the severity of virulent E. coli horizontal transmission and infection of broiler chickens during hatch. The reduction in the severity of the transmission and infection by the BPP might be achieved through alterations of microbiota composition and its community structure.

Citing Articles

Bacillus safensis M01 reversed the inflammatory injury of mice jejunum caused by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88.

Hou X, Meng J, Chen X, Zhao J, Shang K, Wei Y Arch Microbiol. 2025; 207(4):87.

PMID: 40087175 DOI: 10.1007/s00203-025-04287-2.


Effect of In Ovo Supplementation of Slab51 Probiotic Mixture, Associated with Marek's Disease Vaccine, on Growth Performance, Intestinal Morphology and spp. Infection in Broiler Chickens.

Biagini L, Galosi L, Tambella A, Roncarati A, De Bellis D, Pesaro S Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(23).

PMID: 39682404 PMC: 11640549. DOI: 10.3390/ani14233435.


In-ovo injection of Bacillus subtilis, raffinose, and their combinations enhances hatchability, gut health, nutrient transport- and intestinal function-related genes, and early development of broiler chicks.

Shehata A, Seddek N, Khamis T, Elnesr S, Nouri H, Albasri H Poult Sci. 2024; 103(11):104134.

PMID: 39154607 PMC: 11471093. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104134.


Control of in Poultry Using the In Ovo Injection Technique.

Oliveira G, McManus C, Dos Santos V Antibiotics (Basel). 2024; 13(3).

PMID: 38534640 PMC: 10967352. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13030205.


Feeding Techniques of Green Nanoparticles of Silver and Probiotics: Evaluation of Performance, Physiological, and Microbiological Responses of Hatched One-Day-Old Broiler Chicks.

Ahmed M, Ismail Z, Elwardany I, Lohakare J, Abdel-Wareth A Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(23).

PMID: 38067076 PMC: 10705319. DOI: 10.3390/ani13233725.


References
1.
McFall-Ngai M . Adaptive immunity: care for the community. Nature. 2007; 445(7124):153. DOI: 10.1038/445153a. View

2.
Martin R, Nauta A, Ben Amor K, Knippels L, Knol J, Garssen J . Early life: gut microbiota and immune development in infancy. Benef Microbes. 2011; 1(4):367-82. DOI: 10.3920/BM2010.0027. View

3.
Dziva F, Stevens M . Colibacillosis in poultry: unravelling the molecular basis of virulence of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli in their natural hosts. Avian Pathol. 2008; 37(4):355-66. DOI: 10.1080/03079450802216652. View

4.
Kallapura G, Morgan M, Pumford N, Bielke L, Wolfenden A, Faulkner O . Evaluation of the respiratory route as a viable portal of entry for Salmonella in poultry via intratracheal challenge of Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium. Poult Sci. 2014; 93(2):340-6. PMC: 4990883. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2013-03602. View

5.
Qin C, Gong L, Zhang X, Wang Y, Wang Y, Wang B . Effect of and B10 on gut microbiota modulation in broilers. Anim Nutr. 2018; 4(4):358-366. PMC: 6284224. DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2018.03.004. View