» Articles » PMID: 31540340

Genomic Instability and Carcinogenesis of Heavy Charged Particles Radiation: Clinical and Environmental Implications

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Sep 22
PMID 31540340
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One of the uses of ionizing radiation is in cancer treatment. The use of heavy charged particles for treatment has been introduced in recent decades because of their priority for deposition of radiation energy in the tumor, via the Bragg peak phenomenon. In addition to medical implications, exposure to heavy charged particles is a crucial issue for environmental and space radiobiology. Ionizing radiation is one of the most powerful clastogenic and carcinogenic agents. Studies have shown that although both low and high linear energy transfer (LET) radiations are carcinogenic, their risks are different. Molecular studies have also shown that although heavy charged particles mainly induce DNA damage directly, they may be more potent inducer of endogenous generation of free radicals compared to the low LET gamma or X-rays. It seems that the severity of genotoxicity for non-irradiated bystander cells is potentiated as the quality of radiation increases. However, this is not true in all situations. Evidence suggests the involvement of some mechanisms such as upregulation of pro-oxidant enzymes and change in the methylation of DNA in the development of genomic instability and carcinogenesis. This review aimed to report important issues for genotoxicity of carcinogenic effects of heavy charged particles. Furthermore, we tried to explain some mechanisms that may be involved in cancer development following exposure to heavy charged particles.

Citing Articles

Etoricoxib-NLC Mitigates Radiation-Induced Ovarian Damage in Rats: Insights into Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines, Antioxidant Activity, and Hormonal Responses.

Khateeb S Biomolecules. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39858407 PMC: 11761947. DOI: 10.3390/biom15010012.


Protective Potentials of Alpha-Lipoic Acid against Ionizing Radiation-Induced Brain Damage in Rats.

Xu J, Alameri A, Zabibah R, Gabr G, Ramirez-Coronel A, Bagheri H Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2023; 2023:4999306.

PMID: 36778212 PMC: 9918365. DOI: 10.1155/2023/4999306.


Clinical Trial in a Dish for Space Radiation Countermeasure Discovery.

Cao X, Weil M, Wu J Life Sci Space Res (Amst). 2022; 35:140-149.

PMID: 36336359 PMC: 10947779. DOI: 10.1016/j.lssr.2022.05.006.


The Footprint of Exosomes in the Radiation-Induced Bystander Effects.

Jokar S, Marques I, Khazaei S, Martins-Marques T, Girao H, Laranjo M Bioengineering (Basel). 2022; 9(6).

PMID: 35735486 PMC: 9220715. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9060243.


Low-Energy Electron Damage to Condensed-Phase DNA and Its Constituents.

Gao Y, Zheng Y, Sanche L Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(15).

PMID: 34360644 PMC: 8345953. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22157879.


References
1.
Hellweg C, Spitta L, Koch K, Chishti A, Henschenmacher B, Diegeler S . The Role of the Nuclear Factor κB Pathway in the Cellular Response to Low and High Linear Energy Transfer Radiation. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19(8). PMC: 6121395. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19082220. View

2.
Marin A, Martin M, Linan O, Alvarenga F, Lopez M, Fernandez L . Bystander effects and radiotherapy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2014; 20(1):12-21. PMC: 4268598. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.08.004. View

3.
Tseng B, Giedzinski E, Izadi A, Suarez T, Lan M, Tran K . Functional consequences of radiation-induced oxidative stress in cultured neural stem cells and the brain exposed to charged particle irradiation. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013; 20(9):1410-22. PMC: 3936501. DOI: 10.1089/ars.2012.5134. View

4.
. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007; 37(2-4):1-332. DOI: 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003. View

5.
Kobayashi A, Konishi T . Radiation quality effects alteration in COX-2 pathway to trigger radiation-induced bystander response in A549 lung carcinoma cells. J Radiat Res. 2018; 59(6):754-759. PMC: 6251420. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rry065. View