» Articles » PMID: 26317641

Induction of Non-Targeted Stress Responses in Mammary Tissues by Heavy Ions

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Aug 29
PMID 26317641
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Side effects related to radiation exposures are based primarily on the assumption that the detrimental effects of radiation occur in directly irradiated cells. However, several studies have reported over the years of radiation-induced non-targeted/ abscopal effects in vivo that challenge this paradigm. There is evidence that Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) plays an important role in modulating non-targeted effects, including DNA damages in vitro and mutagenesis in vivo. While most reports on radiation-induced non-targeted response utilize x-rays, there is little information available for heavy ions.

Methods And Materials: Adult female transgenic gpt delta mice were exposed to an equitoxic dose of either carbon or argon particles using the Heavy Ion Medical Accelerator in Chiba (HIMAC) at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS) in Japan. The mice were stratified into 4 groups of 5 animals each: Control; animals irradiated under full shielding (Sham-irradiated); animals receiving whole body irradiation (WBIR); and animals receiving partial body irradiation (PBIR) to the lower abdomen with a 1 x 1 cm2 field. The doses used in the carbon ion group (4.5 Gy) and in argon particle group (1.5 Gy) have a relative biological effectiveness equivalent to a 5 Gy dose of x-rays. 24 hours after irradiation, breast tissues in and out of the irradiated field were harvested for analysis. Induction of COX2, 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), phosphorylated histone H2AX (γ-H2AX), and apoptosis-related cysteine protease-3 (Caspase-3) antibodies were examined in the four categories of breast tissues using immunohistochemical techniques. Analysis was performed by measuring the intensity of more than 20 individual microscopic fields and comparing the relative fold difference.

Results: In the carbon ion group, the relative fold increase in COX2 expression was 1.01 in sham-irradiated group (p > 0.05), 3.07 in PBIR (p < 0.05) and 2.50 in WBIR (p < 0.05), respectively, when compared with controls. The relative fold increase in 8-OHdG expression was 1.29 in sham-irradiated (p > 0.05), 11.31 in PBIR (p < 0.05) and 11.79 in WBIR (p < 0.05), respectively, when compared with controls. A similar increase in γ-H2AX expression was found in that, compared to controls, the increase was 1.41 fold in sham-irradiated (p > 0.05), 8.41 in PBIR (p < 0.05) and 10.59 in WBIR (p < 0.05). Results for the argon particle therapy group showed a similar magnitude of changes in the various biological endpoints examined. There was no statistical significance observed in Caspase-3 expression among the 4 groups.

Conclusions: Our data show that both carbon and argon ions induced non-targeted, out of field induction of COX2 and DNA damages in breast tissues. These effects may pose new challenges to evaluate the risks associated with radiation exposure and understanding radiation-induced side effects.

Citing Articles

Value of Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer.

Yu B, Li K, Fan Y, Pei X Int J Part Ther. 2024; 14:100629.

PMID: 39309411 PMC: 11415881. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2024.100629.


Adverse outcome pathways for ionizing radiation and breast cancer involve direct and indirect DNA damage, oxidative stress, inflammation, genomic instability, and interaction with hormonal regulation of the breast.

Helm J, Rudel R Arch Toxicol. 2020; 94(5):1511-1549.

PMID: 32399610 PMC: 7261741. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-020-02752-z.


Carbon ion radiation therapy in breast cancer: a new frontier.

Malouff T, Mahajan A, Mutter R, Krishnan S, Hoppe B, Beltran C Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020; 181(2):291-296.

PMID: 32318954 PMC: 7734650. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05641-2.


Molecular Signaling in Response to Charged Particle Exposures and its Importance in Particle Therapy.

Hellweg C, Chishti A, Diegeler S, Spitta L, Henschenmacher B, Baumstark-Khan C Int J Part Ther. 2019; 5(1):60-73.

PMID: 31773020 PMC: 6871585. DOI: 10.14338/IJPT-18-00016.1.


Genomic Instability and Carcinogenesis of Heavy Charged Particles Radiation: Clinical and Environmental Implications.

Mortezaee K, Najafi M, Farhood B, Ahmadi A, Shabeeb D, Musa A Medicina (Kaunas). 2019; 55(9).

PMID: 31540340 PMC: 6780199. DOI: 10.3390/medicina55090591.


References
1.
Brenner D, Curtis R, Hall E, Ron E . Second malignancies in prostate carcinoma patients after radiotherapy compared with surgery. Cancer. 2000; 88(2):398-406. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000115)88:2<398::aid-cncr22>3.0.co;2-v. View

2.
Matsumoto H, Tomita M, Otsuka K, Hatashita M, Hamada N . Nitric oxide is a key molecule serving as a bridge between radiation-induced bystander and adaptive responses. Curr Mol Pharmacol. 2010; 4(2):126-34. DOI: 10.2174/1874467211104020126. View

3.
Khan M, Van Dyk J, Yeung I, Hill R . Partial volume rat lung irradiation; assessment of early DNA damage in different lung regions and effect of radical scavengers. Radiother Oncol. 2003; 66(1):95-102. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(02)00325-0. View

4.
Mothersill C, Seymour C . Radiation-induced bystander effects--implications for cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004; 4(2):158-64. DOI: 10.1038/nrc1277. View

5.
Imai R, Kamada T, Tsuji H, Yanagi T, Baba M, Miyamoto T . Carbon ion radiotherapy for unresectable sacral chordomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2004; 10(17):5741-6. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0301. View