» Articles » PMID: 31422948

Finger and Forehead PPG Signal Comparison for Respiratory Rate Estimation

Overview
Journal Physiol Meas
Date 2019 Aug 20
PMID 31422948
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: An evaluation of the location of the photoplethysmogram (PPG) sensor for respiratory rate estimation is performed.

Approach: Finger PPG, forehead PPG, and respiratory signal were simultaneously recorded from 35 subjects while breathing spontaneously, and during controlled respiration experiments at a constant rate from 0.1 Hz to 0.6 Hz, in 0.1 Hz steps. Four PPG-derived respiratory (PDR) signals were extracted from each one of the recorded PPG signals: pulse rate variability (PRV), pulse width variability, pulse amplitude variability and the respiratory-induced intensity variability (RIIV). Respiratory rate was estimated from each one of the four PDR signals for both PPG sensor locations. In addition, different combinations of PDR signals, power distribution of the respiratory frequency range and differences of the morphological parameters extracted from both PPG signals have been analysed.

Main Results: Results show better performance in terms of successful estimation and relative error when: (i) PPG signal is recorded in the finger; (ii) the respiratory rate is less than 0.4 Hz; (iii) RIIV signal is not considered. Furthermore, lower spectral power around the respiratory rate in the PDR signals recorded from the forehead was observed.

Significance: These results suggest that respiratory rate estimation is better at lower rates (0.4 Hz and below) and that the finger is better than the forehead to estimate respiratory rate.

Citing Articles

Continuous Critical Respiratory Parameter Measurements Using a Single Low-Cost Relative Humidity Sensor: Evaluation Study.

Vaussenat F, Bhattacharya A, Payette J, Benavides-Guerrero J, Perrotton A, Gerlein L JMIR Biomed Eng. 2024; 8:e47146.

PMID: 38875670 PMC: 11041423. DOI: 10.2196/47146.


Use of artificial intelligence to develop predictive algorithms of cough and PCR-confirmed COVID-19 infections based on inputs from clinical-grade wearable sensors.

Walter J, Lee J, Yu L, Kim B, Martell K, Opdycke A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):8072.

PMID: 38580712 PMC: 10997665. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57830-4.


Validating a Consumer Smartwatch for Nocturnal Respiratory Rate Measurements in Sleep Monitoring.

Jung H, Kim D, Choi J, Joo E Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(18).

PMID: 37766031 PMC: 10536355. DOI: 10.3390/s23187976.


Photoplethysmography upon cold stress-impact of measurement site and acquisition mode.

Fleischhauer V, Bruhn J, Rasche S, Zaunseder S Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1127624.

PMID: 37324389 PMC: 10267461. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1127624.


An Evaluation of Non-Contact Photoplethysmography-Based Methods for Remote Respiratory Rate Estimation.

Boccignone G, DAmelio A, Ghezzi O, Grossi G, Lanzarotti R Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(7).

PMID: 37050444 PMC: 10098914. DOI: 10.3390/s23073387.