» Articles » PMID: 31384074

When the Patient is the Expert: Measuring Patient Experience and Satisfaction with Care

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2019 Aug 7
PMID 31384074
Citations 121
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In 2018, three independent reports were published, emphasizing the need for attention to, and improvements in, quality of care to achieve effective universal health coverage. A key aspect of high quality health care and health systems is that they are person-centred, a characteristic that is at the same time intrinsically important (all individuals have the right to be treated with dignity and respect) and instrumentally important (person-centred care is associated with improved health-care utilization and health outcomes). Following calls to make 2019 a year of action, we provide guidance to policy-makers, researchers and implementers on how they can take on the task of measuring person-centred care. Theoretically, measures of person-centred care allow quality improvement efforts to be evaluated and ensure that health systems are accountable to those they aim to serve. However, in practice, the utility of these measures is limited by lack of clarity and precision in designing and by using measures for different aspects of person-centeredness. We discuss the distinction between two broad categories of measures of patient-centred care: patient experience and patient satisfaction. We frame our discussion of these measures around three key questions: (i) how will the results of this measure be used?; (ii) how will patient subjectivity be accounted for?; and (iii) is this measure validated or tested? By addressing these issues during the design phase, researchers will increase the usability of their measures.

Citing Articles

Did a national extended access scheme translate to improvements in patient experience to GP services in England? A retrospective observational study using patient-level data from the English GP patient survey.

Mou L, Lau Y, Burch P, Whittaker W BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):355.

PMID: 40055699 PMC: 11889905. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12447-9.


Measurement, determinants and outcomes of maternal care satisfaction in Nigeria: a systematic review.

Ope B, Wasan T, Hirst J, Mullins E, Norton R, Peden M BMJ Public Health. 2025; 3(1):e001278.

PMID: 40017937 PMC: 11843491. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001278.


Systematic Review of Outcome Measures in Pharmacologically Managed Chronic Pain: Informing a New Outcome Framework for Healthcare Provider-Led Pharmacotherapy Services.

Sharaf A, Dunlop E, Weir N, Newham R, Alsalah S, Bennie M J Eval Clin Pract. 2025; 31(2):e70029.

PMID: 40012165 PMC: 11865632. DOI: 10.1111/jep.70029.


All the voices we cannot hear: a taxonomy of why some populations' experiences are missing from health and care quality evidence and the Toolkit for Assessing Under Representation in User Surveys (TAURUS).

Graham C, King J, Lerway C, Poots A BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e087627.

PMID: 40010825 PMC: 11865794. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087627.


National Patient Satisfaction Survey as a Predictor for Quality of Care and Quality Improvement - Experience and Practice.

Cui J, Du J, Zhang N, Liang Z Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025; 19:193-206.

PMID: 39885957 PMC: 11780174. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S496684.


References
1.
Peck B, Asch D, Goold S, Roter D, Ubel P, McIntyre L . Measuring patient expectations: does the instrument affect satisfaction or expectations?. Med Care. 2001; 39(1):100-8. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200101000-00011. View

2.
Mant J . Process versus outcome indicators in the assessment of quality of health care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002; 13(6):475-80. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/13.6.475. View

3.
Dawn A, Lee P . Patient expectations for medical and surgical care: a review of the literature and applications to ophthalmology. Surv Ophthalmol. 2004; 49(5):513-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2004.06.004. View

4.
Valentine N, Darby C, Bonsel G . Which aspects of non-clinical quality of care are most important? Results from WHO's general population surveys of "health systems responsiveness" in 41 countries. Soc Sci Med. 2008; 66(9):1939-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.12.002. View

5.
Bleich S, Ozaltin E, Murray C . How does satisfaction with the health-care system relate to patient experience?. Bull World Health Organ. 2009; 87(4):271-8. PMC: 2672587. DOI: 10.2471/blt.07.050401. View