» Articles » PMID: 11176547

Measuring Patient Expectations: Does the Instrument Affect Satisfaction or Expectations?

Overview
Journal Med Care
Specialty Health Services
Date 2001 Feb 15
PMID 11176547
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Fulfillment of patients' expectations may influence health care utilization, affect patient satisfaction, and be used to indicate quality of care. Several different instruments have been used to measure expectations, yet little is known about how different assessment methods affect outcomes.

Objective: The object of the study was to determine whether different measurement instruments elicit different numbers and types of expectations and different levels of patient satisfaction.

Design: Patients waiting to see their physician were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 2 commonly used instruments assessing expectations or were assigned to a third (control) group that was not asked about expectations. After the visit, patients in all 3 groups were asked about their satisfaction and services they received.

Subjects: The study subjects were 290 male, primary care outpatients in a VA general medicine clinic.

Measures: A "short" instrument asked about 3 general expectations for tests, referrals, and new medications, while a "long" instrument nested similar questions within a more detailed list. Wording also differed between the 2 instruments. The short instrument asked patients what they wanted; the long instrument asked patients what they thought was necessary for the physician to do. Satisfaction was measured with a visit-specific questionnaire and a more general assessment of physician interpersonal skills.

Results: Patients receiving the long instrument were more likely to express expectations for tests (83% vs. 28%, P <0.001), referrals (40% vs. 18%, P <0.001), and new medications (45% vs. 28%, P <0.001). The groups differed in the number of unmet expectations: 40% of the long instrument group reported at least 1 unmet expectation compared with 19% of the short instrument group (P <0.001). Satisfaction was similar among the 3 groups.

Conclusions: These different instruments elicit different numbers of expectations but do not affect patient satisfaction.

Citing Articles

Analysis of Real-World Implementation of the Biopsychosocial Approach to Healthcare: Evidence From a Combination of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods.

Xiao X, Song H, Sang T, Wu Z, Xie Y, Yang Q Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12:725596.

PMID: 34764895 PMC: 8576407. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.725596.


Patient experiences after implementing lean primary care redesigns.

Hung D, Mujal G, Jin A, Liang S Health Serv Res. 2020; 56(3):363-370.

PMID: 33305379 PMC: 8143684. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13605.


When the patient is the expert: measuring patient experience and satisfaction with care.

Larson E, Sharma J, Bohren M, Tuncalp O Bull World Health Organ. 2019; 97(8):563-569.

PMID: 31384074 PMC: 6653815. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.18.225201.


Patients' expectations of private osteopathic care in the UK: a national survey of patients.

Leach C, Mandy A, Hankins M, Bottomley L, Cross V, Fawkes C BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013; 13:122.

PMID: 23721054 PMC: 3679882. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-13-122.


The effect of watchful waiting compared to immediate test ordering instructions on general practitioners' blood test ordering behaviour for patients with unexplained complaints; a randomized clinical trial (ISRCTN55755886).

van Bokhoven M, Koch H, van der Weijden T, Weekers-Muyres A, Bindels P, Grol R Implement Sci. 2012; 7:29.

PMID: 22475083 PMC: 3353203. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-29.