» Articles » PMID: 28938885

Development of a Tool to Measure Person-centered Maternity Care in Developing Settings: Validation in a Rural and Urban Kenyan Population

Overview
Journal Reprod Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Sep 24
PMID 28938885
Citations 91
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Person-centered reproductive health care is recognized as critical to improving reproductive health outcomes. Yet, little research exists on how to operationalize it. We extend the literature in this area by developing and validating a tool to measure person-centered maternity care. We describe the process of developing the tool and present the results of psychometric analyses to assess its validity and reliability in a rural and urban setting in Kenya.

Methods: We followed standard procedures for scale development. First, we reviewed the literature to define our construct and identify domains, and developed items to measure each domain. Next, we conducted expert reviews to assess content validity; and cognitive interviews with potential respondents to assess clarity, appropriateness, and relevance of the questions. The questions were then refined and administered in surveys; and survey results used to assess construct and criterion validity and reliability.

Results: The exploratory factor analysis yielded one dominant factor in both the rural and urban settings. Three factors with eigenvalues greater than one were identified for the rural sample and four factors identified for the urban sample. Thirty of the 38 items administered in the survey were retained based on the factors loadings and correlation between the items. Twenty-five items load very well onto a single factor in both the rural and urban sample, with five items loading well in either the rural or urban sample, but not in both samples. These 30 items also load on three sub-scales that we created to measure dignified and respectful care, communication and autonomy, and supportive care. The Chronbach alpha for the main scale is greater than 0.8 in both samples, and that for the sub-scales are between 0.6 and 0.8. The main scale and sub-scales are correlated with global measures of satisfaction with maternity services, suggesting criterion validity.

Conclusions: We present a 30-item scale with three sub-scales to measure person-centered maternity care. This scale has high validity and reliability in a rural and urban setting in Kenya. Validation in additional settings is however needed. This scale will facilitate measurement to improve person-centered maternity care, and subsequently improve reproductive outcomes.

Citing Articles

Case for improving respectful care: results from a cross-sectional survey of person-centred maternity care in rural South Africa.

Doherty T, Horwood C, Mapumulo S, Haskins L, Manda S, Penn-Kekana L BMJ Public Health. 2025; 2(2):e001086.

PMID: 40018554 PMC: 11816963. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001086.


Person-centered maternity care and satisfaction with post-abortion care: A facility-based cross-sectional survey in Northern Uganda.

Udho S, Ekung E, Namutebi D, Aryek-Kwe J, Rubaihayo A, Musinguzi M Womens Health (Lond). 2025; 21:17455057251318897.

PMID: 39949209 PMC: 11826833. DOI: 10.1177/17455057251318897.


Person-centred maternity care during childbirth: a systematic review in low and middle-income countries.

Kassa Z, Dadi A, Bizuayehu H, Hassen T, Ahmed K, Ketema D BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025; 25(1):147.

PMID: 39939934 PMC: 11817757. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-07133-3.


A multi-level meta-analysis of the relationship between decision-making during birth and postpartum mental health.

Arnold L, Volkel M, Rosendahl J, Rost M Health Psychol Behav Med. 2025; 13(1):2456032.

PMID: 39911766 PMC: 11795756. DOI: 10.1080/21642850.2025.2456032.


Towards person-centred maternal and newborn care in Ethiopia: a mixed method study of satisfaction and experiences of care.

Eshetu T, Fekadu E, Abdella A, Mulushoa A, Medhin G, Belina M BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025; 25(1):85.

PMID: 39885399 PMC: 11780771. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-07116-4.


References
1.
Omar M, SCHIFFMAN R, Bingham C . Development and testing of the patient expectations and satisfaction with prenatal care instrument. Res Nurs Health. 2001; 24(3):218-29. DOI: 10.1002/nur.1024. View

2.
Bohren M, Vogel J, Hunter E, Lutsiv O, Makh S, Souza J . The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. PLoS Med. 2015; 12(6):e1001847. PMC: 4488322. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847. View

3.
Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Bruster S . The Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire: development and validation using data from in-patient surveys in five countries. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002; 14(5):353-8. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/14.5.353. View

4.
Isaac T, Zaslavsky A, Cleary P, Landon B . The relationship between patients' perception of care and measures of hospital quality and safety. Health Serv Res. 2010; 45(4):1024-40. PMC: 2910567. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01122.x. View

5.
van den Broek N, Graham W . Quality of care for maternal and newborn health: the neglected agenda. BJOG. 2009; 116 Suppl 1:18-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02333.x. View