» Articles » PMID: 31322692

Deep Learning to Assess Long-term Mortality From Chest Radiographs

Overview
Journal JAMA Netw Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Jul 20
PMID 31322692
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Chest radiography is the most common diagnostic imaging test in medicine and may also provide information about longevity and prognosis.

Objective: To develop and test a convolutional neural network (CNN) (named CXR-risk) to predict long-term mortality, including noncancer death, from chest radiographs.

Design, Setting, And Participants: In this prognostic study, CXR-risk CNN development (n = 41 856) and testing (n = 10 464) used data from the screening radiography arm of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) (n = 52 320), a community cohort of asymptomatic nonsmokers and smokers (aged 55-74 years) enrolled at 10 US sites from November 8, 1993, through July 2, 2001. External testing used data from the screening radiography arm of the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) (n = 5493), a community cohort of heavy smokers (aged 55-74 years) enrolled at 21 US sites from August 2002, through April 2004. Data analysis was performed from January 1, 2018, to May 23, 2019.

Exposure: Deep learning CXR-risk score (very low, low, moderate, high, and very high) based on CNN analysis of the enrollment radiograph.

Main Outcomes And Measures: All-cause mortality. Prognostic value was assessed in the context of radiologists' diagnostic findings (eg, lung nodule) and standard risk factors (eg, age, sex, and diabetes) and for cause-specific mortality.

Results: Among 10 464 PLCO participants (mean [SD] age, 62.4 [5.4] years; 5405 men [51.6%]; median follow-up, 12.2 years [interquartile range, 10.5-12.9 years]) and 5493 NLST test participants (mean [SD] age, 61.7 [5.0] years; 3037 men [55.3%]; median follow-up, 6.3 years [interquartile range, 6.0-6.7 years]), there was a graded association between CXR-risk score and mortality. The very high-risk group had mortality of 53.0% (PLCO) and 33.9% (NLST), which was higher compared with the very low-risk group (PLCO: unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 18.3 [95% CI, 14.5-23.2]; NLST: unadjusted HR, 15.2 [95% CI, 9.2-25.3]; both P < .001). This association was robust to adjustment for radiologists' findings and risk factors (PLCO: adjusted HR [aHR], 4.8 [95% CI, 3.6-6.4]; NLST: aHR, 7.0 [95% CI, 4.0-12.1]; both P < .001). Comparable results were seen for lung cancer death (PLCO: aHR, 11.1 [95% CI, 4.4-27.8]; NLST: aHR, 8.4 [95% CI, 2.5-28.0]; both P ≤ .001) and for noncancer cardiovascular death (PLCO: aHR, 3.6 [95% CI, 2.1-6.2]; NLST: aHR, 47.8 [95% CI, 6.1-374.9]; both P < .001) and respiratory death (PLCO: aHR, 27.5 [95% CI, 7.7-97.8]; NLST: aHR, 31.9 [95% CI, 3.9-263.5]; both P ≤ .001).

Conclusions And Relevance: In this study, the deep learning CXR-risk score stratified the risk of long-term mortality based on a single chest radiograph. Individuals at high risk of mortality may benefit from prevention, screening, and lifestyle interventions.

Citing Articles

Artificial Intelligence in Clinics: Enhancing Cardiology Practice.

Sakamoto A, Nakamura Y, Sato E, Kagiyama N JMA J. 2025; 8(1):131-140.

PMID: 39926098 PMC: 11799705. DOI: 10.31662/jmaj.2024-0190.


Integrating VAI-Assisted Quantified CXRs and Multimodal Data to Assess the Risk of Mortality.

Chen Y, Fang W, Lin C, Tsai D, Hsiang C, Chang C J Imaging Inform Med. 2024; .

PMID: 39448455 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01247-y.


Differential diagnosis of congenital ventricular septal defect and atrial septal defect in children using deep learning-based analysis of chest radiographs.

Jia H, Tang S, Guo W, Pan P, Qian Y, Hu D BMC Pediatr. 2024; 24(1):661.

PMID: 39407181 PMC: 11476512. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-024-05141-y.


Deep learning to predict long-term mortality from plain chest X-ray in patients referred for suspected coronary artery disease.

DAncona G, Savardi M, Massussi M, van der Valk V, Scherptong R, Signoroni A J Thorac Dis. 2024; 16(8):4914-4923.

PMID: 39268143 PMC: 11388213. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-24-322.


External Testing of a Deep Learning Model to Estimate Biologic Age Using Chest Radiographs.

Lee J, Lee D, Lu M, Raghu V, Goo J, Choi Y Radiol Artif Intell. 2024; 6(5):e230433.

PMID: 39046324 PMC: 11427929. DOI: 10.1148/ryai.230433.


References
1.
Zhu C, Pinsky P, Moler J, Kukwa A, Mabie J, Rathmell J . Data sharing in clinical trials: An experience with two large cancer screening trials. PLoS Med. 2017; 14(5):e1002304. PMC: 5441574. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002304. View

2.
Moyer V . Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014; 160(5):330-8. DOI: 10.7326/M13-2771. View

3.
Li H, Boimel P, Janopaul-Naylor J, Zhong H, Xiao Y, Ben-Josef E . DEEP CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS FOR IMAGING DATA BASED SURVIVAL ANALYSIS OF RECTAL CANCER. Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2020; 2019:846-849. PMC: 6955095. DOI: 10.1109/ISBI.2019.8759301. View

4.
Baltruschat I, Nickisch H, Grass M, Knopp T, Saalbach A . Comparison of Deep Learning Approaches for Multi-Label Chest X-Ray Classification. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):6381. PMC: 6476887. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-42294-8. View

5.
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G . Deep learning. Nature. 2015; 521(7553):436-44. DOI: 10.1038/nature14539. View