» Articles » PMID: 31304079

Impact of Sit-stand Desks at Work on Energy Expenditure, Sitting Time and Cardio-metabolic Risk Factors: Multiphase Feasibility Study with Randomised Controlled Component

Overview
Journal Prev Med Rep
Date 2019 Jul 16
PMID 31304079
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Uncertainties remain about the overall effect of sit-stand desks for reducing prolonged sitting among office-based workers. This study assessed the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of the impact of workplace sit-stand desks on overall energy expenditure, sitting time and cardio-metabolic outcomes. It involved four phases: Phase I: online survey; Phase II: workspace auditing; Phase III: randomised intervention (provision of sit-stand desks at work for 3 months); Phase IV: qualitative component. Participants were offıce-based employees of two companies in Cambridge, England. Among Phase I participants interested in the trial, 100 were randomised to Phase II. Of those with workspaces suitable for sit-stand desks, 20 were randomised to Phase III. Those allocated to the intervention completed Phase IV. Outcomes included: trial participation interest, desk-type (full desks/desk mounts) and assessment location (work/laboratory/home) preferences (Phase I); proportion of workspaces permitting sit-stand desk installation (Phase II); energy expenditure, sitting time and cardio-metabolic outcomes (Phase III); study participation experiences (Phase IV). Data were collected between May 2015 and December 2016. Recruitment and trial implementation were feasible: 92% of survey respondents expressed participation interest; 80% of workspaces could accommodate sit-stand desks; assessments were done in workplaces, preferred by 71%. Sit-stand desk provision reduced workplace sitting time by 94 min/day (95% CI 17.7-170.7). Their impact on energy expenditure and cardio-metabolic outcomes is unclear. The results confirm the feasibility of a trial assessing sit-stand desks' impact on energy expenditure, sitting time and cardio-metabolic outcomes, which should reduce uncertainty concerning the intervention's potential to reduce the health risks of prolonged sitting. ISRCTN44827407.

Citing Articles

Effect of Active Workstations on Neurocognitive Performance and Typing Skills: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Medina-Inojosa J, Gomez Ibarra M, Medina-Inojosa B, Supervia M, Jenkins S, Johnson L J Am Heart Assoc. 2024; 13(8):e031228.

PMID: 38572691 PMC: 11262529. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031228.


The effects of active workstations on reducing work-specific sedentary time in office workers: a network meta-analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials.

Zhou L, Deng X, Xu M, Wu Y, Shang X, E F Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023; 20(1):92.

PMID: 37501138 PMC: 10375647. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-023-01467-5.


Effectiveness of Multicomponent Interventions in Office-Based Workers to Mitigate Occupational Sedentary Behavior: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Zhou L, Deng X, Guo K, Hou L, Hui X, Wu Y JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023; 9:e44745.

PMID: 37494100 PMC: 10413238. DOI: 10.2196/44745.


Providing office workers with height-adjustable workstation to reduce and interrupt workplace sitting time: protocol for the Stand Up for Healthy Aging (SUFHA) cluster randomized controlled trial.

Judice P, Silva H, Teno S, Monteiro P, Silva M, Carraca E Trials. 2023; 24(1):381.

PMID: 37280683 PMC: 10245479. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07407-9.


Aortic stiffness increases during prolonged sitting independent of intermittent standing or prior exercise.

Wright A, Stavres J, Galloway R, Donahue P, Sha Z, McCoy S Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022; 123(3):533-546.

PMID: 36334128 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-022-05079-y.


References
1.
Danquah I, Kloster S, Holtermann A, Aadahl M, Tolstrup J . Effects on musculoskeletal pain from "Take a Stand!" - a cluster-randomized controlled trial reducing sitting time among office workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017; 43(4):350-357. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3639. View

2.
Brage S, Brage N, Franks P, Ekelund U, Wareham N . Reliability and validity of the combined heart rate and movement sensor Actiheart. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005; 59(4):561-70. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602118. View

3.
Grant P, Ryan C, Tigbe W, Granat M . The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities. Br J Sports Med. 2006; 40(12):992-7. PMC: 2577473. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.030262. View

4.
Lee I, Shiroma E, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair S, Katzmarzyk P . Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012; 380(9838):219-29. PMC: 3645500. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9. View

5.
Biswas A, Oh P, Faulkner G, Bajaj R, Silver M, Mitchell M . Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015; 162(2):123-32. DOI: 10.7326/M14-1651. View