» Articles » PMID: 31429035

The Effectiveness of Sedentary Behaviour Reduction Workplace Interventions on Cardiometabolic Risk Markers: A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Sports Med
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2019 Aug 21
PMID 31429035
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Sedentary behaviour is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

Objectives: The aims of this work were to systematically review the effects of workplace sedentary behaviour reduction interventions on cardiometabolic risk markers (primary aim) and identify the active behaviour change techniques (BCTs) by which these interventions work (secondary aim).

Methods: A systematic search of 11 databases for articles published up to 12 April 2019 yielded a total of 4255 unique titles, with 29 articles being identified for inclusion. Interventions were rated as very promising, quite promising or non-promising based on their effects on cardiometabolic risk markers compared with baseline and/or a comparison arm. Interventions were coded for BCTs used. To assess the relative effectiveness of BCTs, a promise ratio was calculated as the frequency of a BCT appearing in all promising interventions divided by its frequency of appearance in all non-promising interventions.

Results: A narrative synthesis included 29 published studies of varying study design and comprised of 30 interventions. Risk of bias was high for blinding and allocation concealment, moderate for random sequence generation, and low for outcome assessment. Nine interventions were very promising, 11 were quite promising, 10 were non-promising, and 10 active control groups did not experience cardiometabolic changes. Significant sedentary behaviour reductions were present in all but five studies where cardiometabolic risk markers improved. The BCTs of social comparison, problem solving, demonstration of the behaviour, goal setting (behaviour), behaviour substitution, and habit reversal, demonstrated moderate to high promise ratios.

Conclusions: Workplace interventions show promise for improving cardiometabolic risk markers. The BCTs with the greatest promise of cardiometabolic risk marker improvements included social comparison, those related to individual habits, and behaviour goals.

Registration: This systematic review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017072427).

Citing Articles

Resistance Exercise Training on Musculoskeletal, Metabolic and Psychological Health in Sedentary Office Workers - Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Chandrasekaran B, Bairapareddy K, Rao C J Occup Rehabil. 2025; .

PMID: 39953203 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-025-10273-8.


Effectiveness of workplace health promotion programs for industrial workers: a systematic review.

Javanmardi S, Rappelt L, Zangenberg S, Heinke L, Baumgart C, Niederer D BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):168.

PMID: 39815242 PMC: 11736980. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21365-8.


Continuous work-related sitting time and its association with perceived workplace support for health among workers in the Greater Accra Municipality: a cross-sectional analysis with sensitivity analyses.

Danquah E, Asiamah N BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):3057.

PMID: 39501218 PMC: 11539606. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20572-z.


Promising behavior change techniques for climate-friendly behavior change - a systematic review.

Masciangelo L, Lopez Lumbi S, Rinderhagen M, Hornberg C, Liebig-Gonglach M, Mc Call T Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1396958.

PMID: 39188801 PMC: 11345743. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1396958.


Interventions in the workplace to reduce risk factors for noncommunicable diseases: an umbrella review of systematic reviews of effectiveness.

Turon H, Bezzina A, Lamont H, Barnes C, Lum M, Hodder R J Occup Health. 2024; 66(1).

PMID: 39096275 PMC: 11784587. DOI: 10.1093/joccuh/uiae044.


References
1.
Del Pozo-Cruz J, Garcia-Hermoso A, Alfonso-Rosa R, Alvarez-Barbosa F, Owen N, Chastin S . Replacing Sedentary Time: Meta-analysis of Objective-Assessment Studies. Am J Prev Med. 2018; 55(3):395-402. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.042. View

2.
Thorp A, Healy G, Winkler E, Clark B, Gardiner P, Owen N . Prolonged sedentary time and physical activity in workplace and non-work contexts: a cross-sectional study of office, customer service and call centre employees. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9:128. PMC: 3546308. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-128. View

3.
Hoffmann T, Oxman A, Ioannidis J, Moher D, Lasserson T, Tovey D . Enhancing the usability of systematic reviews by improving the consideration and description of interventions. BMJ. 2017; 358:j2998. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j2998. View

4.
Verweij L, Proper K, Weel A, Hulshof C, van Mechelen W . The application of an occupational health guideline reduces sedentary behaviour and increases fruit intake at work: results from an RCT. Occup Environ Med. 2012; 69(7):500-7. DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100377. View

5.
Nooijen C, Kallings L, Blom V, Ekblom O, Forsell Y, Ekblom M . Common Perceived Barriers and Facilitators for Reducing Sedentary Behaviour among Office Workers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(4). PMC: 5923834. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15040792. View