» Articles » PMID: 35010622

Co-Production at Work: The Process of Breaking Up Sitting Time to Improve Cardiovascular Health. A Pilot Study

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Jan 11
PMID 35010622
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prolonged sitting negatively affects several cardiovascular disease biomarkers. Current workplace physical activity interventions to reduce sitting result in inconsistent uptake and adherence rates. Co-production attempts to improve the translation of evidence to practice through engaging the participants within the intervention design, improving the context sensitivity and acceptability of the intervention. A needs analysis questionnaire was initially conducted ( = 157) to scope workplace behaviours and attitudes. A development group ( = 11) was consulted in focus groups around the needs analysis findings and asked to comment on the feasibility of a proposed intervention. A pilot intervention was then carried out ( = 5). The needs analysis indicated that only 1.8% ( = 4) engaged in occupational physical activity, and 68.7% ( = 103) sat for ≥6 h during their working day. Through the focus groups, an intervention breaking up sitting time hourly with five-minute walking breaks was co-produced. Cultural and pragmatic issues concerning the implementation of frequent physical activity breaks from sitting and the subsequent impact on work productivity were highlighted. The pilot intervention increased the number of breaks from sedentary behaviour from 2 to 11. The co-production methodology resulted in a research- and stakeholder-guided compromise. Large-scale intervention implementation is required before firm effectiveness conclusions can be made.

Citing Articles

Participatory Approaches in the Context of Research Into Workplace Health Promotion to Improve Physical Activity Levels and Reduce Sedentary Behavior Among Office-Based Workers: Scoping Review.

Buffey A, Langley C, Carson B, Donnelly A, Salsberg J JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024; 10:e50195.

PMID: 38896458 PMC: 11222769. DOI: 10.2196/50195.


Co-Creation of a School-Based Motor Competence and Mental Health Intervention: Move Well, Feel Good.

Clifford L, Tyler R, Knowles Z, Ashworth E, Boddy L, Foweather L Children (Basel). 2023; 10(8).

PMID: 37628403 PMC: 10453743. DOI: 10.3390/children10081403.

References
1.
Carter S, Draijer R, Maxwell J, Morris A, Pedersen S, Graves L . Using an e-Health Intervention to Reduce Prolonged Sitting in UK Office Workers: A Randomised Acceptability and Feasibility Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(23). PMC: 7729470. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17238942. View

2.
Peddie M, Kessell C, Bergen T, Gibbons T, Campbell H, Cotter J . The effects of prolonged sitting, prolonged standing, and activity breaks on vascular function, and postprandial glucose and insulin responses: A randomised crossover trial. PLoS One. 2021; 16(1):e0244841. PMC: 7781669. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244841. View

3.
Chau J, van der Ploeg H, van Uffelen J, Wong J, Riphagen I, Healy G . Are workplace interventions to reduce sitting effective? A systematic review. Prev Med. 2010; 51(5):352-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.08.012. View

4.
Larsen R, Kingwell B, Robinson C, Hammond L, Cerin E, Shaw J . Breaking up of prolonged sitting over three days sustains, but does not enhance, lowering of postprandial plasma glucose and insulin in overweight and obese adults. Clin Sci (Lond). 2015; 129(2):117-27. DOI: 10.1042/CS20140790. View

5.
Biswas A, Oh P, Faulkner G, Bajaj R, Silver M, Mitchell M . Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015; 162(2):123-32. DOI: 10.7326/M14-1651. View