» Articles » PMID: 31293438

Metabolic Cost of Activation and Mechanical Efficiency of Mouse Soleus Muscle Fiber Bundles During Repetitive Concentric and Eccentric Contractions

Overview
Journal Front Physiol
Date 2019 Jul 12
PMID 31293438
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Currently available data on the energetics of isolated muscle preparations are based on bouts of less than 10 muscle contractions, whereas metabolic energy consumption is mostly relevant during steady state tasks such as locomotion. In this study we quantified the energetics of small fiber bundles of mouse soleus muscle during prolonged (2 min) series of contractions. Bundles ( = 9) were subjected to sinusoidal length changes, while measuring force and oxygen consumption. Stimulation (five pulses at 100 Hz) occurred either during shortening or during lengthening. Movement frequency (2-3 Hz) and amplitude (0.25-0.50 mm; corresponding to ± 4-8% muscle fiber strain) were close to that reported for mouse soleus muscle during locomotion. The experiments were performed at 32°C. The contributions of cross-bridge cycling and muscle activation to total metabolic energy expenditure were separated using blebbistatin. The mechanical work per contraction cycle decreased sharply during the first 10 cycles, emphasizing the importance of prolonged series of contractions. The mean ± SD fraction of metabolic energy required for activation was 0.37 ± 0.07 and 0.56 ± 0.17 for concentric and eccentric contractions, respectively (both 0.25 mm, 2 Hz). The mechanical efficiency during concentric contractions increased with contraction velocity from 0.12 ± 0.03 (0.25 mm 2 Hz) to 0.15 ± 0.03 (0.25 mm, 3 Hz) and 0.16 ± 0.02 (0.50 mm, 2 Hz) and was -0.22 ± 0.08 during eccentric contractions (0.25 mm, 2 Hz). The percentage of type I fibers correlated positively with mechanical efficiency during concentric contractions, but did not correlate with the fraction of metabolic energy required for activation.

Citing Articles

Muscle-controlled physics simulations of bird locomotion resolve the grounded running paradox.

van Bijlert P, van Soest A, Schulp A, Bates K Sci Adv. 2024; 10(39):eado0936.

PMID: 39321289 PMC: 11423892. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.ado0936.


Mechanism of elastic energy storage of honey bee abdominal muscles under stress relaxation.

Deng Z, Zhang Y, Yan S J Insect Sci. 2023; 23(3).

PMID: 37220090 PMC: 10205004. DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/iead026.

References
1.
Umberger B, Martin P . Mechanical power and efficiency of level walking with different stride rates. J Exp Biol. 2007; 210(Pt 18):3255-65. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.000950. View

2.
Smith N, Barclay C, Loiselle D . The efficiency of muscle contraction. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2004; 88(1):1-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2003.11.014. View

3.
Taylor C, Caldwell S, Rowntree V . Running up and down hills: some consequences of size. Science. 1972; 178(4065):1096-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.178.4065.1096. View

4.
Kovacs M, Toth J, Hetenyi C, Malnasi-Csizmadia A, Sellers J . Mechanism of blebbistatin inhibition of myosin II. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279(34):35557-63. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M405319200. View

5.
Woledge R, Curtin N, Homsher E . Energetic aspects of muscle contraction. Monogr Physiol Soc. 1985; 41:1-357. View