» Articles » PMID: 31267086

Evaluation of an AI System for the Automated Detection of Glaucoma from Stereoscopic Optic Disc Photographs: the European Optic Disc Assessment Study

Overview
Journal Eye (Lond)
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2019 Jul 4
PMID 31267086
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the performance of a deep learning based Artificial Intelligence (AI) software for detection of glaucoma from stereoscopic optic disc photographs, and to compare this performance to the performance of a large cohort of ophthalmologists and optometrists.

Methods: A retrospective study evaluating the diagnostic performance of an AI software (Pegasus v1.0, Visulytix Ltd., London UK) and comparing it with that of 243 European ophthalmologists and 208 British optometrists, as determined in previous studies, for the detection of glaucomatous optic neuropathy from 94 scanned stereoscopic photographic slides scanned into digital format.

Results: Pegasus was able to detect glaucomatous optic neuropathy with an accuracy of 83.4% (95% CI: 77.5-89.2). This is comparable to an average ophthalmologist accuracy of 80.5% (95% CI: 67.2-93.8) and average optometrist accuracy of 80% (95% CI: 67-88) on the same images. In addition, the AI system had an intra-observer agreement (Cohen's Kappa, κ) of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.63-0.85), compared with 0.70 (range: -0.13-1.00; 95% CI: 0.67-0.73) and 0.71 (range: 0.08-1.00) for ophthalmologists and optometrists, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the performance of the deep learning system and ophthalmologists or optometrists.

Conclusion: The AI system obtained a diagnostic performance and repeatability comparable to that of the ophthalmologists and optometrists. We conclude that deep learning based AI systems, such as Pegasus, demonstrate significant promise in the assisted detection of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

Citing Articles

Deep Learning in Glaucoma Detection and Progression Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ling X, Chen H, Yeh P, Cheng Y, Huang C, Shen S Biomedicines. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40002833 PMC: 11852503. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13020420.


Diagnostic Decision-Making Variability Between Novice and Expert Optometrists for Glaucoma: Comparative Analysis to Inform AI System Design.

Ghaffar F, Furtado N, Ali I, Burns C JMIR Med Inform. 2025; 13:e63109.

PMID: 39879089 PMC: 11822325. DOI: 10.2196/63109.


Advancing Glaucoma Care: Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosis, Management, and Progression Detection.

Zhu Y, Salowe R, Chow C, Li S, Bastani O, OBrien J Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(2).

PMID: 38391608 PMC: 10886285. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11020122.


Multi-Dataset Comparison of Vision Transformers and Convolutional Neural Networks for Detecting Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy from Fundus Photographs.

Hwang E, Chen D, Han Y, Jia L, Shan J Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(11).

PMID: 38002390 PMC: 10669064. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10111266.


Characteristics of a Large, Labeled Data Set for the Training of Artificial Intelligence for Glaucoma Screening with Fundus Photographs.

Lemij H, de Vente C, Sanchez C, Vermeer K Ophthalmol Sci. 2023; 3(3):100300.

PMID: 37113471 PMC: 10127130. DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100300.


References
1.
Grigera D, Mello P, Barbosa W, Casiraghi J, Grossmann R, Peyret A . Level of agreement among Latin American glaucoma subspecialists on the diagnosis and treatment of glaucoma: results of an online survey. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2013; 76(3):163-9. DOI: 10.1590/s0004-27492013000300007. View

2.
Fu H, Cheng J, Xu Y, Zhang C, Wong D, Liu J . Disc-Aware Ensemble Network for Glaucoma Screening From Fundus Image. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018; 37(11):2493-2501. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2837012. View

3.
Trikha S, MacGregor C, Jeffery M, Kirwan J . The Portsmouth-based glaucoma refinement scheme: a role for virtual clinics in the future?. Eye (Lond). 2012; 26(10):1288-94. PMC: 3470903. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2012.120. View

4.
Harper R, Radi N, Reeves B, Fenerty C, Spencer A, Batterbury M . Agreement between ophthalmologists and optometrists in optic disc assessment: training implications for glaucoma co-management. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001; 239(5):342-50. DOI: 10.1007/s004170100272. View

5.
Quigley H, Broman A . The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90(3):262-7. PMC: 1856963. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2005.081224. View