» Articles » PMID: 24508161

Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Evaluation (GONE) Project: the Effect of Monoscopic Versus Stereoscopic Viewing Conditions on Optic Nerve Evaluation

Overview
Journal Am J Ophthalmol
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2014 Feb 11
PMID 24508161
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether monoscopic vs stereoscopic viewing impacts evaluation of optic disc photographs for glaucoma diagnosis in an expert population.

Design: Prospective observational study.

Methods: Twenty pairs of high-quality monoscopic and stereoscopic photographs of similar size and magnification (ie, 40 images), were selected to demonstrate a range of optic disc features from a total of 197 eyes of 197 patients with glaucoma and normal subjects recruited from a tertiary clinic. These were presented in randomized order via an interactive platform (http://stereo.gone-project.com/). Participants assessed 9 topographic features and estimated glaucoma likelihood for each photograph. Main outcome measures were intra- and inter-observer agreement.

Results: There was good intra-observer agreement between monoscopic and stereoscopic assessments of glaucoma likelihood (κw = 0.56). There was also good to substantial agreement for peripapillary atrophy (κw = 0.65), cup shape (κw = 0.65), retinal nerve fiber layer loss (κw = 0.69), vertical cup-to-disc ratio (κw = 0.58), and disc shape (κw = 0.57). However, intra-observer agreement was only fair to moderate for disc tilt, cup depth, and disc size (κw = 0.46-0.49). Inter-observer agreement for glaucoma likelihood in monoscopic photographs (κw = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.55-0.67) was substantial and not lower than in stereoscopic photographs (κw = 0.59, CI = 0.54-0.65). Monoscopic photographs did not lead to lower levels of inter-observer agreement compared to stereoscopic photographs in the assessment of any optic disc characteristics, for example disc size (mono κw = 0.65, stereo κw = 0.52) and cup-to-disc ratio (mono κw = 0.72, stereo κw = 0.62).

Conclusions: For expert observers in the evaluation of optic disc photographs for glaucoma likelihood, monoscopic optic disc photographs did not appear to represent a significant disadvantage compared to stereoscopic photographs.

Citing Articles

Big data for imaging assessment in glaucoma.

da Costa D, Medeiros F Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2024; 14(3):299-318.

PMID: 39430345 PMC: 11488812. DOI: 10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-24-00079.


Deep learning for predicting circular retinal nerve fiber layer thickness from fundus photographs and diagnosing glaucoma.

Xu Y, Liu H, Sun R, Wang H, Huo Y, Wang N Heliyon. 2024; 10(13):e33813.

PMID: 39040392 PMC: 11261845. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33813.


Automated Classification of Physiologic, Glaucomatous, and Glaucoma-Suspected Optic Discs Using Machine Learning.

Diener R, Renz A, Eckhard F, Segbert H, Eter N, Malcherek A Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 38893600 PMC: 11171940. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14111073.


Diagnosing glaucoma in primary eye care and the role of Artificial Intelligence applications for reducing the prevalence of undetected glaucoma in Australia.

Jan C, He M, Vingrys A, Zhu Z, Stafford R Eye (Lond). 2024; 38(11):2003-2013.

PMID: 38514852 PMC: 11269618. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-03026-z.


Central retinal vessel trunk exit location: An important factor while evaluating the neuroretinal rim.

Gandhi M, Rajsrinivas D, Jain M, Sabharwal S, Majumdar A, Dubey S Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023; 72(2):240-245.

PMID: 38099578 PMC: 10941929. DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_444_23.