» Articles » PMID: 31243332

Diverse Hydrogen Production and Consumption Pathways Influence Methane Production in Ruminants

Abstract

Farmed ruminants are the largest source of anthropogenic methane emissions globally. The methanogenic archaea responsible for these emissions use molecular hydrogen (H), produced during bacterial and eukaryotic carbohydrate fermentation, as their primary energy source. In this work, we used comparative genomic, metatranscriptomic and co-culture-based approaches to gain a system-wide understanding of the organisms and pathways responsible for ruminal H metabolism. Two-thirds of sequenced rumen bacterial and archaeal genomes encode enzymes that catalyse H production or consumption, including 26 distinct hydrogenase subgroups. Metatranscriptomic analysis confirmed that these hydrogenases are differentially expressed in sheep rumen. Electron-bifurcating [FeFe]-hydrogenases from carbohydrate-fermenting Clostridia (e.g., Ruminococcus) accounted for half of all hydrogenase transcripts. Various H uptake pathways were also expressed, including methanogenesis (Methanobrevibacter), fumarate and nitrite reduction (Selenomonas), and acetogenesis (Blautia). Whereas methanogenesis-related transcripts predominated in high methane yield sheep, alternative uptake pathways were significantly upregulated in low methane yield sheep. Complementing these findings, we observed significant differential expression and activity of the hydrogenases of the hydrogenogenic cellulose fermenter Ruminococcus albus and the hydrogenotrophic fumarate reducer Wolinella succinogenes in co-culture compared with pure culture. We conclude that H metabolism is a more complex and widespread trait among rumen microorganisms than previously recognised. There is evidence that alternative hydrogenotrophs, including acetogenic and respiratory bacteria, can prosper in the rumen and effectively compete with methanogens for H. These findings may help to inform ongoing strategies to mitigate methane emissions by increasing flux through alternative H uptake pathways, including through animal selection, dietary supplementation and methanogenesis inhibitors.

Citing Articles

Response of rumen methane production and microbial community to different abatement strategies in yaks.

Zhang Q, Guo T, Wang X, Wei L, Wang Y, Li S BMC Microbiol. 2025; 25(1):111.

PMID: 40025454 PMC: 11874123. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-025-03817-8.


Dynamics of Intestinal Mucosa Microbiota in Juvenile Sika Deer During Early Growth.

Li S, Mu R, Zhang Y, Wang S, Wright A, Si H Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(3).

PMID: 39940663 PMC: 11817005. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26030892.


Reductive acetogenesis is a dominant process in the ruminant hindgut.

Li Q, Huo J, Ni G, Zhang F, Zhang S, Zhang X Microbiome. 2025; 13(1):28.

PMID: 39876003 PMC: 11773752. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-024-02018-1.


Antarctic Geothermal Soils Exhibit an Absence of Regional Habitat Generalist Microorganisms.

Noell S, Abbaszadeh J, Richards H, Labat Saint Vincent M, Lee C, Herbold C Environ Microbiol. 2025; 27(1):e70032.

PMID: 39871406 PMC: 11772915. DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.70032.


Dynamics and Insights into the Unique Ecological Guild of Fungi in Bacteria-Bioaugmented Anaerobic Digesters.

Obi L, Roopnarain A, Tekere M, Zhou J, Li H, Wang Y J Fungi (Basel). 2025; 11(1).

PMID: 39852475 PMC: 11766663. DOI: 10.3390/jof11010056.


References
1.
BEIJER W . Methane fermentation in the rumen of cattle. Nature. 1952; 170(4327):576-7. DOI: 10.1038/170576a0. View

2.
Whitford M, Teather R, Forster R . Phylogenetic analysis of methanogens from the bovine rumen. BMC Microbiol. 2001; 1:5. PMC: 32158. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-1-5. View

3.
Wright A, Williams A, Winder B, Christophersen C, Rodgers S, Smith K . Molecular diversity of rumen methanogens from sheep in Western Australia. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004; 70(3):1263-70. PMC: 368393. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.3.1263-1270.2004. View

4.
Henderson G, Cox F, Ganesh S, Jonker A, Young W, Janssen P . Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:14567. PMC: 4598811. DOI: 10.1038/srep14567. View

5.
HUNGATE R, Smith W, Bauchop T, Yu I, RABINOWITZ J . Formate as an intermediate in the bovine rumen fermentation. J Bacteriol. 1970; 102(2):389-97. PMC: 247563. DOI: 10.1128/jb.102.2.389-397.1970. View