» Articles » PMID: 31194192

Comparing Small Urinary Extracellular Vesicle Purification Methods with a View to RNA Sequencing-Enabling Robust and Non-invasive Biomarker Research

Overview
Date 2019 Jun 14
PMID 31194192
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Small extracellular vesicles (EVs) are 50-200 nm sized mediators in intercellular communication that reflect both physiological and pathophysiological changes of their parental cells. Thus, EVs hold great potential for biomarker detection. However, reliable purification methods for the downstream screening of the microRNA (miRNA) cargo carried within urinary EVs by small RNA sequencing have yet to be established. To address this knowledge gap, RNA extracted from human urinary EVs obtained by five different urinary EV purification methods (spin column chromatography, immunoaffinity, membrane affinity, precipitation and ultracentrifugation combined with density gradient) was analyzed by small RNA sequencing. Urinary EVs were further characterized by nanoparticle tracking analysis, Western blot analysis and transmission electron microscopy. Comprehensive EV characterization established significant method-dependent differences in size and concentration as well as variances in protein composition of isolated vesicles. Even though all purification methods captured enough total RNA to allow small RNA sequencing, method-dependent differences were also observed with respect to library sizes, mapping distributions, number of miRNA reads and diversity of transcripts. Whereas EVs obtained by immunoaffinity yielded the purest subset of small EVs, highly comparable with results attained by ultracentrifugation combined with density gradient, precipitation and membrane affinity, sample purification by spin column chromatography indicated a tendency to isolate different subtypes of small EVs, which might also carry a distinct subset of miRNAs. Based on our results, different EV purification methods seem to preferentially isolate different subtypes of EVs with varying efficiencies. As a consequence, sequencing experiments and resulting miRNA profiles were also affected. Hence, the selection of a specific EV isolation method has to satisfy the respective research question and should be well considered. In strict adherence with the MISEV (minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles) guidelines, the importance of a combined evaluation of biophysical and proteomic EV characteristics alongside transcriptomic results was clearly demonstrated in this present study.

Citing Articles

Salivary extracellular vesicles isolation methods impact the robustness of downstream biomarkers detection.

Boulestreau J, Molina L, Ouedraogo A, Laramy L, Grich I, Van T Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):31233.

PMID: 39732788 PMC: 11682200. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82488-3.


Immunoaffinity-enriched salivary small extracellular vesicles in periodontitis.

Liu C, Seneviratne C, Palma C, Rice G, Salomon C, Khanabdali R Extracell Vesicles Circ Nucl Acids. 2024; 4(4):698-712.

PMID: 39697803 PMC: 11648426. DOI: 10.20517/evcna.2023.48.


Uromodulin and the study of urinary extracellular vesicles.

Harding M, Yavuz H, Gathmann A, Upson S, Swiatecka-Urban A, Erdbrugger U J Extracell Biol. 2024; 3(11):e70022.

PMID: 39582686 PMC: 11583080. DOI: 10.1002/jex2.70022.


Urinary Extracellular Vesicles as a Readily Available Biomarker Source: A Simplified Stratification Method.

Filipovic L, Spasojevic Savkovic M, Prodanovic R, Matijasevic Jokovic S, Stevanovic S, de Marco A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(15).

PMID: 39125575 PMC: 11311997. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25158004.


Polyethylene glycol-based isolation of urinary extracellular vesicles, an easily adoptable protocol.

Singh A, Patnam S, Manocha A, Bashyam L, Rengan A, Sasidhar M MethodsX. 2023; 11:102310.

PMID: 37608961 PMC: 10440582. DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102310.


References
1.
Miranda K, Bond D, McKee M, Skog J, Paunescu T, da Silva N . Nucleic acids within urinary exosomes/microvesicles are potential biomarkers for renal disease. Kidney Int. 2010; 78(2):191-9. PMC: 4451567. DOI: 10.1038/ki.2010.106. View

2.
Rana S, Yue S, Stadel D, Zoller M . Toward tailored exosomes: the exosomal tetraspanin web contributes to target cell selection. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2012; 44(9):1574-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.06.018. View

3.
Skog J, Wurdinger T, van Rijn S, Meijer D, Gainche L, Sena-Esteves M . Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers. Nat Cell Biol. 2008; 10(12):1470-6. PMC: 3423894. DOI: 10.1038/ncb1800. View

4.
Gheinani A, Vogeli M, Baumgartner U, Vassella E, Draeger A, Burkhard F . Improved isolation strategies to increase the yield and purity of human urinary exosomes for biomarker discovery. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):3945. PMC: 5834546. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-22142-x. View

5.
Hogan M, Manganelli L, Woollard J, Masyuk A, Masyuk T, Tammachote R . Characterization of PKD protein-positive exosome-like vesicles. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 20(2):278-88. PMC: 2637052. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2008060564. View