» Articles » PMID: 22285593

Comparison of Ultracentrifugation, Density Gradient Separation, and Immunoaffinity Capture Methods for Isolating Human Colon Cancer Cell Line LIM1863-derived Exosomes

Overview
Journal Methods
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2012 Jan 31
PMID 22285593
Citations 549
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Exosomes are 40-100nm extracellular vesicles that are released from a multitude of cell types, and perform diverse cellular functions including intercellular communication, antigen presentation, and transfer of oncogenic proteins as well as mRNA and miRNA. Exosomes have been purified from biological fluids and in vitro cell cultures using a variety of strategies and techniques. However, all preparations invariably contain varying proportions of other membranous vesicles that co-purify with exosomes such as shed microvesicles and apoptotic blebs. Using the colorectal cancer cell line LIM1863 as a cell model, in this study we performed a comprehensive evaluation of current methods used for exosome isolation including ultracentrifugation (UC-Exos), OptiPrep™ density-based separation (DG-Exos), and immunoaffinity capture using anti-EpCAM coated magnetic beads (IAC-Exos). Notably, all isolations contained 40-100nm vesicles, and were positive for exosome markers (Alix, TSG101, HSP70) based on electron microscopy and Western blotting. We employed a proteomic approach to profile the protein composition of exosomes, and label-free spectral counting to evaluate the effectiveness of each method. Based on the number of MS/MS spectra identified for exosome markers and proteins associated with their biogenesis, trafficking, and release, we found IAC-Exos to be the most effective method to isolate exosomes. For example, Alix, TSG101, CD9 and CD81 were significantly higher (at least 2-fold) in IAC-Exos, compared to UG-Exos and DG-Exos. Application of immunoaffinity capture has enabled the identification of proteins including the ESCRT-III component VPS32C/CHMP4C, and the SNARE synaptobrevin 2 (VAMP2) in exosomes for the first time. Additionally, several cancer-related proteins were identified in IAC-Exos including various ephrins (EFNB1, EFNB2) and Eph receptors (EPHA2-8, EPHB1-4), and components involved in Wnt (CTNNB1, TNIK) and Ras (CRK, GRB2) signalling.

Citing Articles

Exosomes in liquid biopsy and oncology: Nanotechnological interplay and the quest to overcome cancer drug resistance.

Mukerjee N, Alharbi H, Maitra S, Anand K, Thorat N, Gorai S J Liq Biopsy. 2025; 3:100134.

PMID: 40026560 PMC: 11863983. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlb.2023.100134.


Optical sorting: past, present and future.

Yang M, Shi Y, Song Q, Wei Z, Dun X, Wang Z Light Sci Appl. 2025; 14(1):103.

PMID: 40011460 PMC: 11865320. DOI: 10.1038/s41377-024-01734-5.


Extracellular vesicles: their challenges and benefits as potential biomarkers for musculoskeletal disorders.

Sung S, Seo M, Park W, Lim Y, Park S, Lee G J Int Med Res. 2025; 53(2):3000605251317476.

PMID: 39973226 PMC: 11840854. DOI: 10.1177/03000605251317476.


Stoichiometric constraints for detection of EV-borne biomarkers in blood.

Zarovni N, Mladenovic D, Brambilla D, Panico F, Chiari M J Extracell Vesicles. 2025; 14(2):e70034.

PMID: 39901737 PMC: 11791308. DOI: 10.1002/jev2.70034.


Extracellular vesicles as drug and gene delivery vehicles in central nervous system diseases.

Shi X, He W, Gupta A, To K, Clark L, Mirle N Biomater Sci. 2025; 13(5):1161-1178.

PMID: 39871579 PMC: 11773327. DOI: 10.1039/d4bm01394h.