» Articles » PMID: 37208684

Integrating Automated Liquid Handling in the Separation Workflow of Extracellular Vesicles Enhances Specificity and Reproducibility

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2023 May 19
PMID 37208684
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Extracellular vesicles (EV) are extensively studied in human body fluids as potential biomarkers for numerous diseases. Major impediments of EV-based biomarker discovery include the specificity and reproducibility of EV sample preparation as well as intensive manual labor. We present an automated liquid handling workstation for the density-based separation of EV from human body fluids and compare its performance to manual handling by (in)experienced researchers.

Results: Automated versus manual density-based separation of trackable recombinant extracellular vesicles (rEV) spiked in PBS significantly reduces variability in rEV recovery as quantified by fluorescent nanoparticle tracking analysis and ELISA. To validate automated density-based EV separation from complex body fluids, including blood plasma and urine, we assess reproducibility, recovery, and specificity by mass spectrometry-based proteomics and transmission electron microscopy. Method reproducibility is the highest in the automated procedure independent of the matrix used. While retaining (in urine) or enhancing (in plasma) EV recovery compared to manual liquid handling, automation significantly reduces the presence of body fluid specific abundant proteins in EV preparations, including apolipoproteins in plasma and Tamm-Horsfall protein in urine.

Conclusions: In conclusion, automated liquid handling ensures cost-effective EV separation from human body fluids with high reproducibility, specificity, and reduced hands-on time with the potential to enable larger-scale biomarker studies.

Citing Articles

Filter-Aided Extracellular Vesicle Enrichment (FAEVEr) for Proteomics.

Pauwels J, Van de Steene T, Van de Velde J, De Muyer F, De Pauw D, Baeke F Mol Cell Proteomics. 2025; 24(2):100907.

PMID: 39842778 PMC: 11872570. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2025.100907.


Uromodulin and the study of urinary extracellular vesicles.

Harding M, Yavuz H, Gathmann A, Upson S, Swiatecka-Urban A, Erdbrugger U J Extracell Biol. 2024; 3(11):e70022.

PMID: 39582686 PMC: 11583080. DOI: 10.1002/jex2.70022.


Identification and validation of extracellular vesicle reference genes for the normalization of RT-qPCR data.

Pinheiro C, Guilbert N, Lippens L, Roux Q, Boiy R, Fischer S J Extracell Vesicles. 2024; 13(4):e12421.

PMID: 38545822 PMC: 10974686. DOI: 10.1002/jev2.12421.

References
1.
Kalra H, Adda C, Liem M, Ang C, Mechler A, Simpson R . Comparative proteomics evaluation of plasma exosome isolation techniques and assessment of the stability of exosomes in normal human blood plasma. Proteomics. 2013; 13(22):3354-64. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201300282. View

2.
Kuypers S, Smisdom N, Pintelon I, Timmermans J, Ameloot M, Michiels L . Unsupervised Machine Learning-Based Clustering of Nanosized Fluorescent Extracellular Vesicles. Small. 2021; 17(5):e2006786. DOI: 10.1002/smll.202006786. View

3.
Hendrix A . The nature of blood(y) extracellular vesicles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021; 22(4):243. DOI: 10.1038/s41580-021-00348-8. View

4.
Mussack V, Wittmann G, Pfaffl M . Comparing small urinary extracellular vesicle purification methods with a view to RNA sequencing-Enabling robust and non-invasive biomarker research. Biomol Detect Quantif. 2019; 17:100089. PMC: 6554496. DOI: 10.1016/j.bdq.2019.100089. View

5.
Vergauwen G, Dhondt B, Van Deun J, De Smedt E, Berx G, Timmerman E . Confounding factors of ultrafiltration and protein analysis in extracellular vesicle research. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):2704. PMC: 5457435. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02599-y. View