» Articles » PMID: 31177992

Total Copy Number Variation As a Prognostic Factor in Adult Astrocytoma Subtypes

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Neurology
Date 2019 Jun 11
PMID 31177992
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Since the discovery that IDH1/2 mutations confer a significantly better prognosis in astrocytomas, much work has been done to identify other molecular signatures to help further stratify lower-grade astrocytomas and glioblastomas, with the goal of accurately predicting clinical outcome and identifying potentially targetable mutations. In the present study, we subclassify 135 astrocytomas (67 IDH-wildtype and 68 IDH-mutant) from The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset (TCGA) on the basis of grade, IDH-status, and the previously established prognostic factors, CDK4 amplification and CDKN2A/B deletion, within the IDH-mutant groups. We analyzed these groups for total copy number variation (CNV), total mutation burden, chromothripsis, specific mutations, and amplifications/deletions of specific genes/chromosomal regions. Herein, we demonstrate that across all of these tumor groups, total CNV level is a relatively consistent prognostic factor. We also identified a trend towards increased levels of chromothripsis in tumors with lower progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) intervals. While no significant differences were identified in overall mutation load, we did identify a significantly higher number of cases with mutations in genes with functions related to maintaining genomic stability in groups with higher mean CNV and worse PFS and OS intervals, particularly in the IDH-mutant groups. Our data further support the case for total CNV level as a potential prognostic factor in astrocytomas, and suggest mutations in genes responsible for overall genomic instability as a possible underlying mechanism for some astrocytomas with poor clinical outcome.

Citing Articles

Longitudinal profiling of IDH-mutant astrocytomas reveals acquired RAS-MAPK pathway mutations associated with inferior survival.

Rodriguez Almaraz E, Guerra G, Al-Adli N, Young J, Dada A, Quintana D Neurooncol Adv. 2025; 7(1):vdaf024.

PMID: 40051658 PMC: 11883348. DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf024.


Therapy enhancing chromosome instability may be advantageous for gliomas.

Goncharov N, Baklanov I, Gulaia V, Shuliak A, Lanskikh D, Zhmenia V NAR Cancer. 2025; 7(1):zcaf003.

PMID: 39949830 PMC: 11822378. DOI: 10.1093/narcan/zcaf003.


IDH-mutant gliomas in children and adolescents - from biology to clinical trials.

Evans L, Trinder S, Dodgshun A, Eisenstat D, Whittle J, Hansford J Front Oncol. 2025; 14:1515538.

PMID: 39876890 PMC: 11773619. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1515538.


The molecular history of IDH-mutant astrocytomas without adjuvant treatment.

Shi Z, Li K, Kwan J, Chung N, Wong S, Chu A Brain Pathol. 2024; 35(2):e13300.

PMID: 39473241 PMC: 11835445. DOI: 10.1111/bpa.13300.


Genetic and epigenetic instability as an underlying driver of progression and aggressive behavior in IDH-mutant astrocytoma.

Richardson T, Walker J, Hambardzumyan D, Brem S, Hatanpaa K, Viapiano M Acta Neuropathol. 2024; 148(1):5.

PMID: 39012509 PMC: 11252228. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-024-02761-7.


References
1.
Richardson T, Sathe A, Kanchwala M, Jia G, Habib A, Xiao G . Genetic and Epigenetic Features of Rapidly Progressing IDH-Mutant Astrocytomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2018; 77(7):542-548. PMC: 6005148. DOI: 10.1093/jnen/nly026. View

2.
Jones M, Jallepalli P . Chromothripsis: chromosomes in crisis. Dev Cell. 2012; 23(5):908-17. PMC: 3514072. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.10.010. View

3.
Abecasis G, Auton A, Brooks L, DePristo M, Durbin R, Handsaker R . An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature. 2012; 491(7422):56-65. PMC: 3498066. DOI: 10.1038/nature11632. View

4.
de Tayrac M, Etcheverry A, Aubry M, Saikali S, Hamlat A, Quillien V . Integrative genome-wide analysis reveals a robust genomic glioblastoma signature associated with copy number driving changes in gene expression. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2008; 48(1):55-68. DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20618. View

5.
Reich M, Liefeld T, Gould J, Lerner J, Tamayo P, Mesirov J . GenePattern 2.0. Nat Genet. 2006; 38(5):500-1. DOI: 10.1038/ng0506-500. View