» Articles » PMID: 31146640

Inferring the Direction of a Causal Link and Estimating Its Effect Via a Bayesian Mendelian Randomization Approach

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialties Public Health
Science
Date 2019 Jun 1
PMID 31146640
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The use of genetic variants as instrumental variables - an approach known as Mendelian randomization - is a popular epidemiological method for estimating the causal effect of an exposure (phenotype, biomarker, risk factor) on a disease or health-related outcome from observational data. Instrumental variables must satisfy strong, often untestable assumptions, which means that finding good genetic instruments among a large list of potential candidates is challenging. This difficulty is compounded by the fact that many genetic variants influence more than one phenotype through different causal pathways, a phenomenon called horizontal pleiotropy. This leads to errors not only in estimating the magnitude of the causal effect but also in inferring the direction of the putative causal link. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian approach called BayesMR that is a generalization of the Mendelian randomization technique in which we allow for pleiotropic effects and, crucially, for the possibility of reverse causation. The output of the method is a posterior distribution over the target causal effect, which provides an immediate and easily interpretable measure of the uncertainty in the estimation. More importantly, we use Bayesian model averaging to determine how much more likely the inferred direction is relative to the reverse direction.

Citing Articles

Associations between Sjogren syndrome and psychiatric disorders in European populations: a 2-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.

Pan L, Zhou G, Wei G, Zhao Q, Wang Y, Chen Q Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1465381.

PMID: 39479595 PMC: 11521899. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1465381.


GWAS advancements to investigate disease associations and biological mechanisms.

Omidiran O, Patel A, Usman S, Mhatre I, Abdelhalim H, DeGroat W Clin Transl Discov. 2024; 4(3).

PMID: 38737752 PMC: 11086745. DOI: 10.1002/ctd2.296.


simmrd: An open-source tool to perform simulations in Mendelian randomization.

Lorincz-Comi N, Yang Y, Zhu X Genet Epidemiol. 2024; 48(2):59-73.

PMID: 38263619 PMC: 11524156. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22544.


A Bayesian approach to Mendelian randomization using summary statistics in the univariable and multivariable settings with correlated pleiotropy.

Grant A, Burgess S Am J Hum Genet. 2024; 111(1):165-180.

PMID: 38181732 PMC: 10806746. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.12.002.


Mendelian randomization.

Sanderson E, Glymour M, Holmes M, Kang H, Morrison J, Munafo M Nat Rev Methods Primers. 2023; 2.

PMID: 37325194 PMC: 7614635. DOI: 10.1038/s43586-021-00092-5.


References
1.
Wang Y, Wang Y, Li J, Zhang Y, Yin H, Han B . Body Mass Index and Risk of Parkinson's Disease: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies. PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0131778. PMC: 4488297. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131778. View

2.
Burgess S, Thompson S . Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017; 32(5):377-389. PMC: 5506233. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-017-0255-x. View

3.
Didelez V, Sheehan N . Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference. Stat Methods Med Res. 2007; 16(4):309-30. DOI: 10.1177/0962280206077743. View

4.
Zhu Z, Zheng Z, Zhang F, Wu Y, Trzaskowski M, Maier R . Causal associations between risk factors and common diseases inferred from GWAS summary data. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):224. PMC: 5768719. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02317-2. View

5.
Verweij K, Treur J, Vink J . Investigating causal associations between use of nicotine, alcohol, caffeine and cannabis: a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. Addiction. 2018; 113(7):1333-1338. DOI: 10.1111/add.14154. View