Statistical Methods for Mendelian Randomization in Genome-wide Association Studies: A Review

Overview

Journal Comput Struct Biotechnol J

Specialty Biotechnology

Date 2022 May 26

PMID 35615025

Authors

Frederick J Boehm

Xiang Zhou

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies have yielded thousands of associations for many common diseases and disease-related complex traits. The identified associations made it possible to identify the causal risk factors underlying diseases and investigate the causal relationships among complex traits through Mendelian randomization. Mendelian randomization is a form of instrumental variable analysis that uses SNP associations from genome-wide association studies as instruments to study and uncover causal relationships between complex traits. By leveraging SNP genotypes as instrumental variables, or proxies, for the exposure complex trait, investigators can tease out causal effects from observational data, provided that necessary assumptions are satisfied. We discuss below the development of Mendelian randomization methods in parallel with the growth of genome-wide association studies. We argue that the recent availability of GWAS summary statistics for diverse complex traits has motivated new Mendelian randomization methods with relaxed causality assumptions and that this area continues to offer opportunities for robust biological discoveries.

Citing Articles

Bone mineral density and sex hormone binding globulin as potential mediators of the causal effect of urolithiasis on osteoporosis risk: a Mendelian randomization.

Guo J, Chen X, Yi X, Dou Y, Xiong Y, Zhao T Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 16:1460682.

PMID: 40078581 PMC: 11896853. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1460682.

Causal Association Between Major Depressive Disorder and Cortical Structure: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study and Mediation Analysis.

Zheng H, Fang Y, Wang X, Feng S, Tang T, Chen M CNS Neurosci Ther. 2025; 31(3):e70319.

PMID: 40059068 PMC: 11890974. DOI: 10.1111/cns.70319.

From teeth to bone: dental caries has causal effects on osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture.

Zhang G, Zheng J, Zhou Y, Zhou M, Zhang J, Liu Y BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):340.

PMID: 40045256 PMC: 11881354. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05735-7.

Bidirectional Mendelian randomization study reveals interplay between multisite chronic pain and Post-traumatic stress disorder.

Chen Z, Yang Q, Zhang S, Peng T Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7413.

PMID: 40033042 PMC: 11876571. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91715-4.

Genetically Elevated Selenoprotein S Levels and Risk of Stroke: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Analysis.

He Y, Liu Y, Meng H, Sun J, Rui Y, Tian X Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(4).

PMID: 40004116 PMC: 11855697. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26041652.

References

Burgess S, Dudbridge F, Thompson S . Re: "Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects". Am J Epidemiol. 2015; 181(4):290-1. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwv017. View

Rees J, Wood A, Dudbridge F, Burgess S . Robust methods in Mendelian randomization via penalization of heterogeneous causal estimates. PLoS One. 2019; 14(9):e0222362. PMC: 6756542. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222362. View

Burgess S, Butterworth A, Thompson S . Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data. Genet Epidemiol. 2013; 37(7):658-65. PMC: 4377079. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21758. View

Wang L, Gao B, Fan Y, Xue F, Zhou X . Mendelian randomization under the omnigenic architecture. Brief Bioinform. 2021; 22(6). DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbab322. View

Bowden J, Del Greco M F, Minelli C, Davey Smith G, Sheehan N, Thompson J . A framework for the investigation of pleiotropy in two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization. Stat Med. 2017; 36(11):1783-1802. PMC: 5434863. DOI: 10.1002/sim.7221. View

Visscher P, Brown M, McCarthy M, Yang J . Five years of GWAS discovery. Am J Hum Genet. 2012; 90(1):7-24. PMC: 3257326. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.11.029. View

Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Haycock P, Burgess S . Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator. Genet Epidemiol. 2016; 40(4):304-14. PMC: 4849733. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21965. View

Visscher P, Wray N, Zhang Q, Sklar P, McCarthy M, Brown M . 10 Years of GWAS Discovery: Biology, Function, and Translation. Am J Hum Genet. 2017; 101(1):5-22. PMC: 5501872. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.06.005. View

Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S . Mendelian randomization: prospects, potentials, and limitations. Int J Epidemiol. 2004; 33(1):30-42. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyh132. View

10.

Yuan Z, Liu L, Guo P, Yan R, Xue F, Zhou X . Likelihood-based Mendelian randomization analysis with automated instrument selection and horizontal pleiotropic modeling. Sci Adv. 2022; 8(9):eabl5744. PMC: 8890724. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abl5744. View

11.

Klein R, Zeiss C, Chew E, Tsai J, Sackler R, Haynes C . Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2005; 308(5720):385-9. PMC: 1512523. DOI: 10.1126/science.1109557. View

12.

Pierce B, Burgess S . Efficient design for Mendelian randomization studies: subsample and 2-sample instrumental variable estimators. Am J Epidemiol. 2013; 178(7):1177-84. PMC: 3783091. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwt084. View

13.

Yuan Z, Zhu H, Zeng P, Yang S, Sun S, Yang C . Testing and controlling for horizontal pleiotropy with probabilistic Mendelian randomization in transcriptome-wide association studies. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):3861. PMC: 7395774. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17668-6. View

14.

Burgess S, Thompson S . Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017; 32(5):377-389. PMC: 5506233. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-017-0255-x. View

15.

Didelez V, Sheehan N . Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference. Stat Methods Med Res. 2007; 16(4):309-30. DOI: 10.1177/0962280206077743. View

16.

Allman P, Aban I, Long D, Patki A, MacKenzie T, Irvin M . Mendelian randomization in the multivariate general linear model framework. Genet Epidemiol. 2021; 46(1):17-31. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22435. View

17.

Clarke L, Zheng-Bradley X, Smith R, Kulesha E, Xiao C, Toneva I . The 1000 Genomes Project: data management and community access. Nat Methods. 2012; 9(5):459-62. PMC: 3340611. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1974. View

18.

He L, Culminskaya I, Loika Y, Arbeev K, Bagley O, Duan M . Causal effects of cardiovascular risk factors on onset of major age-related diseases: A time-to-event Mendelian randomization study. Exp Gerontol. 2017; 107:74-86. PMC: 5874182. DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2017.09.019. View

19.

Windmeijer F, Farbmacher H, Davies N, Davey Smith G . On the Use of the Lasso for Instrumental Variables Estimation with Some Invalid Instruments. J Am Stat Assoc. 2019; 114(527):1339-1350. PMC: 6817329. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1498346. View

20.

Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S . 'Mendelian randomization': can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease?. Int J Epidemiol. 2003; 32(1):1-22. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyg070. View