» Articles » PMID: 30561657

Improving the Accuracy of Two-sample Summary-data Mendelian Randomization: Moving Beyond the NOME Assumption

Overview
Journal Int J Epidemiol
Specialty Public Health
Date 2018 Dec 19
PMID 30561657
Citations 357
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization (MR) incorporating multiple genetic variants within a meta-analysis framework is a popular technique for assessing causality in epidemiology. If all genetic variants satisfy the instrumental variable (IV) and necessary modelling assumptions, then their individual ratio estimates of causal effect should be homogeneous. Observed heterogeneity signals that one or more of these assumptions could have been violated.

Methods: Causal estimation and heterogeneity assessment in MR require an approximation for the variance, or equivalently the inverse-variance weight, of each ratio estimate. We show that the most popular 'first-order' weights can lead to an inflation in the chances of detecting heterogeneity when in fact it is not present. Conversely, ostensibly more accurate 'second-order' weights can dramatically increase the chances of failing to detect heterogeneity when it is truly present. We derive modified weights to mitigate both of these adverse effects.

Results: Using Monte Carlo simulations, we show that the modified weights outperform first- and second-order weights in terms of heterogeneity quantification. Modified weights are also shown to remove the phenomenon of regression dilution bias in MR estimates obtained from weak instruments, unlike those obtained using first- and second-order weights. However, with small numbers of weak instruments, this comes at the cost of a reduction in estimate precision and power to detect a causal effect compared with first-order weighting. Moreover, first-order weights always furnish unbiased estimates and preserve the type I error rate under the causal null. We illustrate the utility of the new method using data from a recent two-sample summary-data MR analysis to assess the causal role of systolic blood pressure on coronary heart disease risk.

Conclusions: We propose the use of modified weights within two-sample summary-data MR studies for accurately quantifying heterogeneity and detecting outliers in the presence of weak instruments. Modified weights also have an important role to play in terms of causal estimation (in tandem with first-order weights) but further research is required to understand their strengths and weaknesses in specific settings.

Citing Articles

Unraveling the brain-joint axis: genetic, transcriptomic, and cohort insights from neuroticism to osteoarthritis.

Zhang J, Li Y, Li Y, Liu H Mamm Genome. 2025; .

PMID: 40080206 DOI: 10.1007/s00335-025-10112-4.


The causal relationships between inflammatory cytokines, blood metabolites, and thyroid cancer: a two-step Mendelian randomization analysis.

Liu W, Sun Y, Zhang Y, Yin D Discov Oncol. 2025; 16(1):301.

PMID: 40072746 PMC: 11904021. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-025-02029-w.


Association between allergic rhinitis, nasal polyps, chronic sinusitis and chronic respiratory diseases: a mendelian randomization study.

Ren F, Zhang L, Zhao D, Zhang J BMC Pulm Med. 2025; 25(1):109.

PMID: 40069797 PMC: 11899691. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-025-03523-1.


The Role of Circulating Fatty Acids in Mediating the Effect of Insomnia on Heart Failure: A Two-Step, Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.

Zuo B, Yu B, Wang P, Zhang C, Zhao C, Sun Y Nat Sci Sleep. 2025; 17:391-399.

PMID: 40060366 PMC: 11890014. DOI: 10.2147/NSS.S471466.


Biomarker identification for Alzheimer's disease through integration of comprehensive Mendelian randomization and proteomics data.

Zhan H, Cammann D, Cummings J, Dong X, Chen J J Transl Med. 2025; 23(1):278.

PMID: 40050982 PMC: 11884171. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-025-06317-5.


References
1.
Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Haycock P, Burgess S . Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator. Genet Epidemiol. 2016; 40(4):304-14. PMC: 4849733. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21965. View

2.
Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S . 'Mendelian randomization': can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease?. Int J Epidemiol. 2003; 32(1):1-22. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyg070. View

3.
Lawlor D, Tilling K, Davey Smith G . Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 2017; 45(6):1866-1886. PMC: 5841843. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw314. View

4.
Davey Smith G, Hemani G . Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies. Hum Mol Genet. 2014; 23(R1):R89-98. PMC: 4170722. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddu328. View

5.
Bowden J, Del Greco M F, Minelli C, Davey Smith G, Sheehan N, Thompson J . Assessing the suitability of summary data for two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses using MR-Egger regression: the role of the I2 statistic. Int J Epidemiol. 2016; 45(6):1961-1974. PMC: 5446088. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw220. View