» Articles » PMID: 31111275

KRAS Status is Related to Histological Phenotype in Gastric Cancer: Results from a Large Multicentre Study

Overview
Journal Gastric Cancer
Date 2019 May 22
PMID 31111275
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is histologically a very heterogeneous disease, and the temporal development of different histological phenotypes remains unclear. Recent studies in lung and ovarian cancer suggest that KRAS activation (KRASact) can influence histological phenotype. KRASact likely results from KRAS mutation (KRASmut) or KRAS amplification (KRASamp). The aim of the study was to investigate whether KRASmut and/or KRASamp are related to the histological phenotype in GC.

Methods: Digitized haematoxylin/eosin-stained slides from 1282 GC resection specimens were classified according to Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) and the Lauren classification by at least two observers. The relationship between KRAS status, predominant histological phenotype and clinicopathological variables was assessed.

Results: KRASmut and KRASamp were found in 68 (5%) and 47 (7%) GCs, respectively. Within the KRASmut and KRASamp cases, the most frequent GC histological phenotype was moderately differentiated tubular 2 (tub2) type (KRASmut: n = 27, 40%; KRASamp: n = 21, 46%) or intestinal type (KRASmut: n = 41, 61%; KRASamp: n = 23, 50%). Comparing individual histological subtypes, mucinous carcinoma displayed the highest frequency of KRASmut (JGCA: n = 6, 12%, p = 0.012; Lauren: n = 6, 12%, p = 0.013), and KRASamp was more frequently found in poorly differentiated solid type (n = 12, 10%, p = 0.267) or indeterminate type (n = 12, 10%, p = 0.480) GC. 724 GCs (57%) had intratumour morphological heterogeneity.

Conclusions: This is the largest GC study investigating KRAS status and histological phenotype. We identified a relationship between KRASmut and mucinous phenotype. The high level of intratumour morphological heterogeneity could reflect KRASmut heterogeneity, which may explain the failure of anti-EGFR therapy in GC.

Citing Articles

The relationship between the gastric cancer microbiome and clinicopathological factors: a metagenomic investigation from the 100,000 genomes project and The Cancer Genome Atlas.

Booth M, Wood H, Travis M, Quirke P, Grabsch H Gastric Cancer. 2025; .

PMID: 39961991 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-025-01588-9.


The potential contribution of aberrant cathepsin K expression to gastric cancer pathogenesis.

Feng Z, Gao L, Lu Y, He X, Xie J Discov Oncol. 2024; 15(1):218.

PMID: 38856944 PMC: 11164852. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-023-00814-z.


The Combination of Afatinib With Dasatinib or Miransertib Results in Synergistic Growth Inhibition of Stomach Cancer Cells.

Al-Janaby T, Nahi N, Seddon A, Bagwan I, Khelwatty S, Modjtahedi H World J Oncol. 2024; 15(2):192-208.

PMID: 38545471 PMC: 10965263. DOI: 10.14740/wjon1769.


Generalizable biomarker prediction from cancer pathology slides with self-supervised deep learning: A retrospective multi-centric study.

Niehues J, Quirke P, West N, Grabsch H, van Treeck M, Schirris Y Cell Rep Med. 2023; 4(4):100980.

PMID: 36958327 PMC: 10140458. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.100980.


Development of alternative herbals remedy for gastric cancer based on transcriptomic analysis of immune infiltration and ferroptosis.

Li M, Tao J, Qian R, Jiang F, Song Y, Zeng Z Front Genet. 2023; 14:1086368.

PMID: 36936437 PMC: 10020191. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1086368.


References
1.
Coudray N, Ocampo P, Sakellaropoulos T, Narula N, Snuderl M, Fenyo D . Classification and mutation prediction from non-small cell lung cancer histopathology images using deep learning. Nat Med. 2018; 24(10):1559-1567. PMC: 9847512. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0177-5. View

2.
Arai T, Matsuda Y, Aida J, Takubo K, Ishiwata T . Solid-type poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the stomach: clinicopathological and molecular characteristics and histogenesis. Gastric Cancer. 2018; 22(2):314-322. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-018-0862-6. View

3.
Esemuede I, Forslund A, Khan S, Qin L, Gimbel M, Nash G . Improved testing for microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer using a simplified 3-marker assay. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17(12):3370-8. PMC: 3269820. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1147-4. View

4.
. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011; 14(2):101-12. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-011-0041-5. View

5.
Cristescu R, Lee J, Nebozhyn M, Kim K, Ting J, Wong S . Molecular analysis of gastric cancer identifies subtypes associated with distinct clinical outcomes. Nat Med. 2015; 21(5):449-56. DOI: 10.1038/nm.3850. View