Antibacterial Properties of Polyphenols: Characterization and QSAR (Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship) Models
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Besides their established antioxidant activity, many phenolic compounds may exhibit significant antibacterial activity. Here, the effect of a large dataset of 35 polyphenols on the growth of 6 foodborne pathogenic or food-spoiling bacterial strains, three Gram-positive ones (s, , and ) and three Gram-negative ones (, and Enteritidis), have been characterized. As expected, the effects of phenolic compounds were highly heterogeneous ranging from bacterial growth stimulation to antibacterial activity and depended on bacterial strains. The effect on bacterial growth of each of the polyphenols was expressed as relative Bacterial Load Difference (BLD) between a culture with and without (control) polyphenols at a 1 g L concentration after 24 h incubation at 37°C. Reliable Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) models were developed (regardless of polyphenol class or the mechanism of action involved) to predict BLD for . Enteritidis, s, and , unlike for and . was generally sensitive to polyphenols whereas was not. No satisfactory models predicting the BLD of and were obtained due to their specific and quite constant behavior toward polyphenols. The main descriptors involved in reliable QSAR models were the lipophilicity and the electronic and charge properties of the polyphenols. The models developed for the two Gram-negative bacteria (. Enteritidis) were comparable suggesting similar mechanisms of toxic action. This was not clearly observed for the two Gram-positive bacteria (s and ). Interestingly, a preliminary evaluation by Microbial Adhesion To Solvents (MATS) measurements of surface properties of the two Gram-negative bacteria for which QSAR models were based on similar physico-chemical descriptors, revealed that MATS results were also quite similar. Moreover, the MATS results of the two Gram-positive bacterial strains and for which QSARs were not based on similar physico-chemical descriptors also strongly differed. These observations suggest that the antibacterial activity of most of polyphenols likely depends on interactions between polyphenols and bacterial cells surface, although the surface properties of the bacterial strains should be further investigated with other techniques than MATS.
Modulating Polyphenol Activity with Metal Ions: Insights into Dermatological Applications.
Cioanca O, Lungu I, Batir-Marin D, Lungu A, Marin G, Huzum R Pharmaceutics. 2025; 17(2).
PMID: 40006561 PMC: 11858937. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17020194.
Pointcheval M, Masse A, Flochlay D, Chanonat F, Estival J, Durand M Front Microbiol. 2025; 16:1536185.
PMID: 39935647 PMC: 11813221. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1536185.
Stoyanova Y, Lazarova-Zdravkova N, Peshev D Membranes (Basel). 2025; 15(1.
PMID: 39852262 PMC: 11767990. DOI: 10.3390/membranes15010021.
Unveiling the nanoworld of antimicrobial resistance: integrating nature and nanotechnology.
Sharma D, Gautam S, Singh S, Srivastava N, Khan A, Bisht D Front Microbiol. 2025; 15():1391345.
PMID: 39850130 PMC: 11754303. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1391345.
Nguyen T, Kim J, Hung N, Tho N, Tran Q, Van Hung H Food Sci Biotechnol. 2025; 34(1):169-179.
PMID: 39758739 PMC: 11695526. DOI: 10.1007/s10068-024-01612-1.