The Development of Language-specific and Language-independent Talker Processing

Overview

Journal J Speech Lang Hear Res

Date 2013 Jan 1

PMID 23275425

Citations 6

Authors

Susannah V Levi

Richard G Schwartz

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, the authors aimed to investigate how differences in language ability relate to differences in processing talker information in the native language and an unfamiliar language by comparing performance for different ages and for groups with impaired language.

Method: Three groups of native English listeners with typical language development (TLD; ages 7-9, ages 10-12, adults) and 2 groups with specific language impairment (SLI; ages 7-9, ages 10-12) participated in the study. Listeners heard pairs of words in both English and German (unfamiliar language) and were asked to determine whether the words were produced by the same or different talkers.

Results: In English, talker discrimination improved with age. In German, performance improved with age for the school-age children but was worse for adult listeners. No differences were found between TLD and SLI children.

Conclusion: These results show that as listeners' language skills develop, there is a trade-off between more general perceptual abilities useful for processing talker information in any language and those that are relevant to their everyday language experiences and, thus, tied to the phonology. The lack of differences between the children with and without language impairments suggests that general auditory processing may be intact in at least some children with SLI.

Citing Articles

Introducing the Sisu Voice Matching Test (SVMT): A novel tool for assessing voice discrimination in Chinese.

Xu T, Jiang X, Zhang P, Wang A Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(3):86.

PMID: 39900852 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-025-02608-3.

Unveiling the development of human voice perception: Neurobiological mechanisms and pathophysiology.

Harford E, Holt L, Abel T Curr Res Neurobiol. 2024; 6:100127.

PMID: 38511174 PMC: 10950757. DOI: 10.1016/j.crneur.2024.100127.

Language Ability and the Familiar Talker Advantage: Generalizing to Unfamiliar Talkers Is What Matters.

Levi S, Harel D, Schwartz R J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019; 62(5):1427-1436.

PMID: 31021674 PMC: 6808318. DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0160.

Another bilingual advantage? Perception of talker-voice information.

Levi S Biling (Camb Engl). 2018; 21(3):523-536.

PMID: 29755282 PMC: 5945195. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728917000153.

Dyslexia Limits the Ability to Categorize Talker Dialect.

Long G, Fox R, Jacewicz E J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016; 59(5):900-914.

PMID: 27575597 PMC: 5345562. DOI: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-15-0106.

References

Maye J, Weiss D, Aslin R . Statistical phonetic learning in infants: facilitation and feature generalization. Dev Sci. 2008; 11(1):122-34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00653.x. View

Catts H, Adlof S, Hogan T, Weismer S . Are specific language impairment and dyslexia distinct disorders?. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006; 48(6):1378-96. PMC: 2853030. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/096). View

Decasper A, Fifer W . Of human bonding: newborns prefer their mothers' voices. Science. 1980; 208(4448):1174-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.7375928. View

Perrachione T, Del Tufo S, Gabrieli J . Human voice recognition depends on language ability. Science. 2011; 333(6042):595. PMC: 4242590. DOI: 10.1126/science.1207327. View

Perrachione T, Wong P . Learning to recognize speakers of a non-native language: implications for the functional organization of human auditory cortex. Neuropsychologia. 2007; 45(8):1899-910. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.015. View

Bartholomeus B . Voice identification by nursery school children. Can J Psychol. 1973; 27(4):464-72. DOI: 10.1037/h0082498. View

Tallal P . Rapid auditory processing in normal and disordered language development. J Speech Hear Res. 1976; 19(3):561-71. DOI: 10.1044/jshr.1903.561. View

Winters S, Levi S, Pisoni D . Identification and discrimination of bilingual talkers across languages. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008; 123(6):4524-38. PMC: 2680657. DOI: 10.1121/1.2913046. View

McAnally K, Hansen P, Cornelissen P, Stein J . Effect of time and frequency manipulation on syllable perception in developmental dyslexics. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997; 40(4):912-24. DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4004.912. View

10.

McArthur G, Hogben J, Edwards V, Heath S, Mengler E . On the "specifics" of specific reading disability and specific language impairment. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2000; 41(7):869-74. View

11.

Maye J, Werker J, Gerken L . Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition. 2001; 82(3):B101-11. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00157-3. View

12.

Bishop D, Snowling M . Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: same or different?. Psychol Bull. 2004; 130(6):858-86. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.858. View

13.

Wright B, Lombardino L, King W, Puranik C, Leonard C, Merzenich M . Deficits in auditory temporal and spectral resolution in language-impaired children. Nature. 1997; 387(6629):176-8. DOI: 10.1038/387176a0. View

14.

GOGGIN J, Thompson C, STRUBE G, Simental L . The role of language familiarity in voice identification. Mem Cognit. 1991; 19(5):448-58. DOI: 10.3758/bf03199567. View

15.

Tallal P, Piercy M . Defects of non-verbal auditory perception in children with developmental aphasia. Nature. 1973; 241(5390):468-9. DOI: 10.1038/241468a0. View

16.

Serniclaes W, Sprenger-Charolles L, Carre R, Demonet J . Perceptual discrimination of speech sounds in developmental dyslexia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001; 44(2):384-99. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2001/032). View

17.

Johnson E, Westrek E, Nazzi T, Cutler A . Infant ability to tell voices apart rests on language experience. Dev Sci. 2011; 14(5):1002-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01052.x. View

18.

McArthur G, Bishop D . Which People with Specific Language Impairment have Auditory Processing Deficits?. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010; 21(1):79-94. DOI: 10.1080/02643290342000087. View

19.

Mody M, Studdert-Kennedy M, Brady S . Speech perception deficits in poor readers: auditory processing or phonological coding?. J Exp Child Psychol. 1997; 64(2):199-231. DOI: 10.1006/jecp.1996.2343. View

20.

Green K, Tomiak G, Kuhl P . The encoding of rate and talker information during phonetic perception. Percept Psychophys. 1997; 59(5):675-92. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206015. View