» Articles » PMID: 30962801

What Do We Know About the Stewardship Gap

Overview
Journal Data Sci J
Publisher Ubiquity Press
Date 2019 Apr 10
PMID 30962801
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the 21 century, digital data drive innovation and decision-making in nearly every field. However, little is known about the total size, characteristics, and sustainability of these data. In the scholarly sphere, it is widely suspected that there is a gap between the amount of valuable digital data that is produced and the amount that is effectively stewarded and made accessible. The Stewardship Gap Project (http://bit.ly/stewardshipgap) investigates characteristics of, and measures, the stewardship gap for sponsored scholarly activity in the United States. This paper presents a preliminary definition of the stewardship gap based on a review of relevant literature and investigates areas of the stewardship gap for which metrics have been developed and measurements made, and where work to measure the stewardship gap is yet to be done. The main findings presented are 1) there is not one stewardship gap but rather multiple "gaps" that contribute to whether data is responsibly stewarded; 2) there are relationships between the gaps that can be used to guide strategies for addressing the various stewardship gaps; and 3) there are imbalances in the types and depths of studies that have been conducted to measure the stewardship gap.

Citing Articles

The TRUST Principles for digital repositories.

Lin D, Crabtree J, Dillo I, Downs R, Edmunds R, Giaretta D Sci Data. 2020; 7(1):144.

PMID: 32409645 PMC: 7224370. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7.


What Do We Know About the Stewardship Gap.

York J, Gutmann M, Berman F Data Sci J. 2019; 17.

PMID: 30962801 PMC: 6450659. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2018-019.

References
1.
Wallis J, Rolando E, Borgman C . If we share data, will anyone use them? Data sharing and reuse in the long tail of science and technology. PLoS One. 2013; 8(7):e67332. PMC: 3720779. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067332. View

2.
Hilbert M, Lopez P . The world's technological capacity to store, communicate, and compute information. Science. 2011; 332(6025):60-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1200970. View

3.
Read K, Sheehan J, Huerta M, Knecht L, Mork J, Humphreys B . Sizing the Problem of Improving Discovery and Access to NIH-Funded Data: A Preliminary Study. PLoS One. 2015; 10(7):e0132735. PMC: 4514623. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132735. View

4.
Tenopir C, Allard S, Douglass K, Aydinoglu A, Wu L, Read E . Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions. PLoS One. 2011; 6(6):e21101. PMC: 3126798. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021101. View

5.
Fecher B, Friesike S, Hebing M . What drives academic data sharing?. PLoS One. 2015; 10(2):e0118053. PMC: 4340811. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118053. View