» Articles » PMID: 25714752

What Drives Academic Data Sharing?

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Feb 26
PMID 25714752
Citations 79
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite widespread support from policy makers, funding agencies, and scientific journals, academic researchers rarely make their research data available to others. At the same time, data sharing in research is attributed a vast potential for scientific progress. It allows the reproducibility of study results and the reuse of old data for new research questions. Based on a systematic review of 98 scholarly papers and an empirical survey among 603 secondary data users, we develop a conceptual framework that explains the process of data sharing from the primary researcher's point of view. We show that this process can be divided into six descriptive categories: Data donor, research organization, research community, norms, data infrastructure, and data recipients. Drawing from our findings, we discuss theoretical implications regarding knowledge creation and dissemination as well as research policy measures to foster academic collaboration. We conclude that research data cannot be regarded as knowledge commons, but research policies that better incentivise data sharing are needed to improve the quality of research results and foster scientific progress.

Citing Articles

Caribbean data-sharing initiatives: activities of the Eastern Caribbean Health Outcomes Research Network.

Wang K, Britton M, Hambleton I, Howitt C, Jeyaseelan S, Fraser K Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2024; 48:e121.

PMID: 39687248 PMC: 11648151. DOI: 10.26633/RPSP.2024.121.


Unmasking the Ethical Dimensions of Data-sharing in Health Research: Perspectives from Researchers at a Public University in Uganda.

Kutyabami P, Muyinda H, Mukuru M, Mwaka E, Pakoyo K, Kalyango J Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 39574886 PMC: 11581113. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5204585/v1.


Does the use of unusual combinations of datasets contribute to greater scientific impact?.

Yu Y, Romero D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(41):e2402802121.

PMID: 39356667 PMC: 11474085. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2402802121.


Re-use of research data in the social sciences. Use and users of digital data archive.

Late E, Ochsner M PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0303190.

PMID: 38728275 PMC: 11086874. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303190.


A study on formalizing the knowledge of data curation activities across different fields.

Minamiyama Y, Takeda H, Hayashi M, Asaoka M, Yamaji K PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0301772.

PMID: 38662657 PMC: 11045097. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301772.


References
1.
Chandramohan D, Shibuya K, Setel P, Cairncross S, Lopez A, Murray C . Should data from demographic surveillance systems be made more widely available to researchers?. PLoS Med. 2008; 5(2):e57. PMC: 2253613. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050057. View

2.
Wicherts J, Borsboom D, Kats J, Molenaar D . The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis. Am Psychol. 2006; 61(7):726-8. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.726. View

3.
Cooper M . Sharing Data and Results in Ethnographic Research: Why This Should not be an Ethical Imperative. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2009; 2(1):3-19. DOI: 10.1525/jer.2007.2.1.3. View

4.
Ludman E, Fullerton S, Spangler L, Trinidad S, Fujii M, Jarvik G . Glad you asked: participants' opinions of re-consent for dbGap data submission. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010; 5(3):9-16. PMC: 3071850. DOI: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.3.9. View

5.
Perrino T, Howe G, Sperling A, Beardslee W, Sandler I, Shern D . Advancing Science Through Collaborative Data Sharing and Synthesis. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013; 8(4):433-44. PMC: 3826878. DOI: 10.1177/1745691613491579. View