» Articles » PMID: 30941844

Distinct and Opposite Profiles of Connectivity During Self-reference Task and Rest in Youth at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis

Overview
Journal Hum Brain Mapp
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Neurology
Date 2019 Apr 4
PMID 30941844
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Self-reference is impaired in psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia, associated with disability, and closely related to characteristic patterns of aberrant brain connectivity. However, at present, it is unclear whether self-reference is impacted in pathogenesis of the disorder. Alterations in connectivity during a self-reference task or resting-state in the psychosis risk (i.e., prodromal) period may yield important clues for biomarker development, as well as for novel treatment targets. This study examined a task-based and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging in individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis (n = 22) and healthy control unaffected peers (n = 20). The self-reference task comprised three task conditions where subjects were asked if an adjective was relevant to themselves (self), a designated other individual (other), or to evaluate the word's spelling (letter). Connectivity analyses examined medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), regions commonly found in conjunction analyses of self-reference, during both the self-reference task and rest. In task connectivity analyses, CHR individuals exhibited decreased mPFC-PCC connectivity when compared to controls. In resting-state analyses, CHR participants showed greater mPFC-PCC connectivity. Taken together, results suggest that psychosis-like alterations in mPFC-PCC connectivity is present prior to psychosis onset across both task and rest.

Citing Articles

Causal Roles of Ventral and Dorsal Neural Systems for Automatic and Control Self-Reference Processing: A Function Lesion Mapping Study.

Sui J, Rotshtein P, Lu Z, Chechlacz M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(14).

PMID: 39064210 PMC: 11278450. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13144170.


Temporal Properties of Self-Prioritization.

Lu Z, He X, Yi D, Sui J Entropy (Basel). 2024; 26(3).

PMID: 38539754 PMC: 10969339. DOI: 10.3390/e26030242.


Self-concept and Narrative Identity in Youth at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.

Cowan H, McAdams D, Ouellet L, Jones C, Mittal V Schizophr Bull. 2023; 50(4):848-859.

PMID: 37816626 PMC: 11283199. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbad142.


A functional neuroimaging study of self-other processing alterations in atypical developmental trajectories of psychotic-like experiences.

Assaf R, Ouellet J, Bourque J, Stip E, Leyton M, Conrod P Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):16324.

PMID: 36175570 PMC: 9522794. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20129-3.


Interactions between the cortical midline structures and sensorimotor network track maladaptive self-beliefs in clinical high risk for psychosis.

Cowan H, Damme K, Mittal V Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2022; 8(1):74.

PMID: 36114173 PMC: 9481626. DOI: 10.1038/s41537-022-00279-z.


References
1.
Honey C, Sporns O, Cammoun L, Gigandet X, Thiran J, Meuli R . Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(6):2035-40. PMC: 2634800. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0811168106. View

2.
De Achaval D, Costanzo E, Villarreal M, Jauregui I, Chiodi A, Castro M . Emotion processing and theory of mind in schizophrenia patients and their unaffected first-degree relatives. Neuropsychologia. 2009; 48(5):1209-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.12.019. View

3.
Winkler A, Ridgway G, Webster M, Smith S, Nichols T . Permutation inference for the general linear model. Neuroimage. 2014; 92:381-97. PMC: 4010955. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.060. View

4.
Nordgaard J, Parnas J . Self-disorders and the schizophrenia spectrum: a study of 100 first hospital admissions. Schizophr Bull. 2014; 40(6):1300-7. PMC: 4193705. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbt239. View

5.
Friston K, Holmes A, Price C, Buchel C, Worsley K . Multisubject fMRI studies and conjunction analyses. Neuroimage. 1999; 10(4):385-96. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0484. View