» Articles » PMID: 30927096

Gender and Survival of Critically Ill Patients: Results from the FROG-ICU Study

Overview
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2019 Mar 31
PMID 30927096
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Few studies analyzed gender-related outcome differences of critically ill patients and found inconsistent results. This study aimed to test the independent association of gender and long-term survival of ICU patients.

Materials And Methods: FROG-ICU was a prospective, observational, multi-center cohort designed to investigate the long-term mortality of critically ill adult patients. The primary endpoint of this study was 1-year mortality after ICU admission of women compared to men.

Results: The study included 2087 patients, 726 women and 1361 men. Women and men had similar baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, and disease severity. No significant difference in 1-year mortality was found between women and men (34.9% vs. 37.9%, P = 0.18). After multivariable adjustment, no difference in the hazard of death was observed [HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.77-1.28)]. Similar 1-year survival between women and men was found in a propensity score-matched patient cohort of 506 patients [HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.54-1.14)].

Conclusion: Women constituted one-third of the population of critically ill patients and were unexpectedly similar to men regarding demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and disease severity and had similar risk of death at 1 year after ICU admission. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01367093; registered on June 6, 2011.

Citing Articles

Sex specific differences in short-term mortality after ICU-delirium.

Schreiber N, Eichlseder M, Orlob S, Klivinyi C, Zoidl P, Pichler A Crit Care. 2024; 28(1):413.

PMID: 39695698 PMC: 11654059. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05204-7.


Sex differences in the use of mechanical ventilation in a neurointensive care population: a retrospective study.

Stretti F, Utebay D, Bogli S, Brandi G BMC Pulm Med. 2024; 24(1):284.

PMID: 38890713 PMC: 11184830. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-024-03094-7.


Sex differences in intensive care unit admissions in Australia and New Zealand.

Modra L, Pilcher D, Bailey M, Bellomo R Crit Care Resusc. 2023; 23(1):86-93.

PMID: 38075190 PMC: 10702790. DOI: 10.51893/2021.1.OA8.


Sex and gender differences in intensive care medicine.

Merdji H, Long M, Ostermann M, Herridge M, Myatra S, De Rosa S Intensive Care Med. 2023; 49(10):1155-1167.

PMID: 37676504 PMC: 10556182. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-023-07194-6.


Sex-specific outcomes in COVID-19: missing pieces of the puzzle.

Magoon R, Choudhary N Can J Anaesth. 2023; 70(6):1108-1109.

PMID: 37165130 PMC: 10171905. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-023-02469-4.


References
1.
Raine R, Goldfrad C, Rowan K, Black N . Influence of patient gender on admission to intensive care. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002; 56(6):418-23. PMC: 1732172. DOI: 10.1136/jech.56.6.418. View

2.
Reinikainen M, Niskanen M, Uusaro A, Ruokonen E . Impact of gender on treatment and outcome of ICU patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005; 49(7):984-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00759.x. View

3.
Winters B, Eberlein M, Leung J, Needham D, Pronovost P, Sevransky J . Long-term mortality and quality of life in sepsis: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2010; 38(5):1276-83. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d8cc1d. View

4.
Pietropaoli A, Glance L, Oakes D, Fisher S . Gender differences in mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Gend Med. 2010; 7(5):422-37. PMC: 3322379. DOI: 10.1016/j.genm.2010.09.005. View

5.
Latour J, Lopez-Camps V, Giner J, Nolasco A, Alvarez-Dardet C . Predictors of death following ICU discharge. Intensive Care Med. 1990; 16(2):125-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF02575307. View